Wednesday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Annie ... Say It Ain't So!

"Ask Annie" is my favorite stop in Fortune. Not this week! "Ask Annie" reports on a recent survey that finds only 20% of 1,500 companies "see individual drive as a desirable trait."

Could it be true?
Are bosses truly the idiots Scott Adams/Dilbert claims?

Tom Peters posted this on 11/23/04.

Comments

Managers must be managed like anyone else - they like cool people that ALWAYS show respect and solve their pressing challenges!!!

Dilbert is for others - too negative based for me!!! Thanks CM.

Posted by Freeman at November 23, 2004 3:50 PM


To much management, to much do it this way, to much stay focussed on the way we do it here.. Don't change the process, our process is best.. and please don't THINK.>>>> UHHHH!!! That's what I was told when I worked for the leader in their industry. Funny how things work out the company has since decided to merge with a rival and the brand will disappear all together!

Posted by PJm at November 23, 2004 4:00 PM


Induvidual drive got me chased out of the big companies.

Drive is for entrepreneurs and business owners.

Individual drive is not good for most employees because such thinking poses a threat to everyone around them.

I left the W-2 world and opened my own business as a 1099 contractor and having drive to succeed pushed me farther than I would have ever gone in a big company.

Posted by Erick Blackwelder at November 23, 2004 9:53 PM


Tom, even scarier...Lucy Kellway in yesterday's FT pointed out that she had lunch with a senior manager who told her that the biggest problem he faced was employee's who are too intelligent, too dissenting and too creative. He feels that this is very disruptive to the business because they don't do what they are told or they do it grudgingly and so don't do it well. He also thinks diversity is dangerous because in his view too many different ideas lead to chaos. He even cites an incident where one of his minions ( super smart) wrote a report that was full of nuance and complexity and he just threw it out saying if he couldn't "get it" in ten minutes he wasn't interested.
Now, as a self professed nympho for info who is fanatic about new learning and totally geeked by creativity, design and wierd and wacky people, this scared the shit out of me. So I emailed the journalsit and she says this attitude is the norm in the great majority of businesses in this country. I have just started on this work and career thing and it looks like everything is stacked against the kind of person I am. It's all over. They have won. And then I thought, "bullshit". Every system has a glitch, and so it is my intention to find it and exploit it to the maximum. What's the alternative? keep my nose clean and hope for the best? Never.

Posted by Fredd at November 24, 2004 4:39 AM


"Are bosses truly the idiots Scott Adams/Dilbert claims?"
A lot of them, yes.

What's a highly desirable trait for these guys? Loyalty. The employee sticks with the boss because he/she's the boss. Don't think, just do. Ugggghhhh . . .

Posted by Ron at November 24, 2004 3:39 PM


Scott Adams insightfully spotlights the bottom feeders - employees, managers and consultants - that so often burrow into the bowels of old guard companies. Although conniving administrators and showboat politicians are considered "bosses", they should never be confused with leaders. Regardless of organizational position, leadership is earned by finding the right raw talent, adding personal value and building the relationships and confidence needed within the team to make something special happen. Companies who build their culture on REAL sustainable leadership and have the fortitude to drive out the parasites (starting at the top) are rare - which is one reason for the consistent turnover in the Fortune 50. It's also why blind corporate loyalty is (and should be) dead and gone.

Posted by Tom C. at November 24, 2004 9:46 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

viagra for sale cheap buy viagra in sydney

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012 get viagra prescription

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004 viagra price 100mg

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

viagra wholesale uk

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

prescription free viagra

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

brand viagra echeck

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page. best canadian viagra prices online