Wednesday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Boomer Debunking

The romanticized stereotype of Baby Boomers is that we were all conceived when daddy came home from WWII, were raised by June Cleaver and then embarked on lives of free love and war protests. Certainly anyone who really thinks about it knows that can't all be true, but as businesses and governments are figuring out how to deal with us in our old age, it would be a good idea to get over the myths and understand the real facts. A few examples:
-While the oldest boomers are approaching 60, the youngest are barely 40.
-Even in the '60s, we weren't all political radicals. One-third of the early boomers served in Vietnam and the majority of southern youth resisted integration just as fiercely as their parents did.
-Despite the civil rights movement and women's lib, the disparity of education and income levels between boomers of different races and genders is still huge.

A study of baby boomers at midlife by researchers at Duke University highlights the differences within the various ethnic, economic and age groups of the generation. Elizabeth Hughes, one of the authors of the study, believes that the country's current divisiveness is a result of the enormous diversity of the life experiences of the boomers. Co-author Angela O'Rand warns, "If we are worried about the future as the boomers age, we need to be prepared for a very, very heterogeneous group of people."

Amen, sister.

Linda Fatherree posted this on 01/13/05.

Comments

Hughes is off base on the "country's current divisiveness". That opinion doesn't hold water, like the "values" media spin during the last election.

The USA has always been divisive - and we need more of it - to get back to the roots of our REVOLUTION and the brilliance of the Constitution as a founding product for this republic. Radical revolution is where it is at, Linda, et. al.

Posted by John at January 13, 2005 12:45 PM


Interesting Article in the Vanguard Investment Newsletter; of the 70 million baby boomers: 1/3 are in debt with no positive networth, 1/3 have a zero base networth (assets = liabilities), and 1/3 have sufficient funds to retire in the coming retirement years.

Posted by RTodd at January 13, 2005 1:06 PM


Interesting read, the Baby Boomer article. The Baby Boomers--as such a large group of the overall population--do drive a lot of what goes on in the USA. However, in the vein of John's suggestion, divisiveness is, to a great extent, what this country (USA) was built on. Read the Isaacson biography of Benjamin Franklin (or even BF's autobiography) and you'll see that whatever divisiveness is present today is likely an outcry/growth of the ideals and circumstances on which the USA was based.

Still, the Boomers did (and will, as we know from Tom's rants) have enormous impact on everything. One generation's expectations and ideals trickle down--in one way or another--to the next generation (i.e. RTodd's post and implications for GenX, GenY, etc.)...

Posted by Lee H. Igel at January 13, 2005 1:43 PM


the actual babybommer gen Y, is not in this sphere of the globe , rather in Asia !! The segment for cellphones, gizmodo's etc etc is a huge markert in china and india and infusion of cash and equity resides in that playing field !!

Posted by /pd at January 13, 2005 2:28 PM


What fascinates me at the moment is how the media will handle the aging Boomers. Ignore them? Play to the reminiscence of their youth? Aging in the U.S. has been an (almost) taboo subject. Now the Boomers are facing these issues with their parents, causing them to wonder what to make of the retirement communities, assisted living, etc. I hope to see a redefining of aging in this country. Perhaps the Boomers might pull it off.

Posted by Mary Rose Maguire at January 13, 2005 7:38 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.