Sunday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Badvertising: Logix

Driving into Houston this evening from Geo Bush Airport ... I see a billboard for a company called "Logix," presumably some sort of IT services organization. The billboard copy read:

Our CEO is a bigger geek than their CEO.

Gee ... I can't wait to hear more.

(2 miles later, I see a great billboard: It was for an animal shelter, promoting pet adoption. There was a very cute picture of a cat, looking right at you, with copy that read "It's ok. You can come in and just take a look.")

Steve Yastrow posted this on 01/18/05.

Comments

Maybe it's because I'm a bit of a geek, but I like the sound of that ad.
It sure beats the "Providing quality solutions to meet you business needs" type of thing that so many IT companies end up using.
And it also harks back to something I remember Tom writing in "The Pursuit of Wow!" about companies having CEOs that can demonstrate their products.

Posted by Gary at January 18, 2005 5:21 AM


I am not sure I like that particular ad but I do agree with Gary. I have worked for a long time in the IT industry (both vendor and buyer side) and I am sick and tired of hearing the words solution and business needs. It has become part of the background noise.

So many times I have sat with customers and seen sales and marketing types talking about solutions etc. The customer's eyes glaze over - there is no connection. What they want to know is does the PRODUCT have the features they want to use.

It IS that simple!!!!

Why are we scared to talk about products??

Let's get something straight - people buy products despite the way sales and marketing go about their business not because of.

It’s all about brand and emotional connection now – The problem is that what I want is good PRODUCTS and the world isn’t delivering

Posted by PaulH at January 18, 2005 9:36 AM


Sorry - bit of a rant there! But I guess I can't be accused of lacking in passion!

Posted by PaulH at January 18, 2005 9:38 AM


Steve - you are in an ADWORLD parallel universe - I know how you feel though.

Geico, AFLAC and others that disturb my few REMAINING moments of "SANITY" incur bad-mouthing and RANTING e-mails.

Take back the AD landscape I say - we must prevail.

Posted by John at January 18, 2005 9:59 AM


Gary and Paul, the TRUE problem is that neither the sales drones nor the technogeeks are really talking TO the prospect -- they're both talking AT them.

The geeks care only about the technical sophistry of their products, and how well engineereed they are, as I'm sure Tom understands quite well, with his Engineering background.

The sales drones, completely unable to fathom the engineering and well, frankly, geekiness, that goes into making all those things whiz, ding, and pop... resign themselves to the bullet pointed list of features that they just KNOW the client will want. (probably decided in some ivory tower meeting, rather than by conducting actual market research)

In the end, from both parties, the client is left wanting -- wanting to know What's In It For Me?

I hear that this CEO's a great big geek -- and I have to put the pieces together... and? So he's a geek, what's in it for me? Why do I care whether he hacks together open source operating system code on the weekend? Or does his being a geek simply mean that he holes up in in exclusive luxury condo on the beach... playing Dungeons and Dragons with local college kids?

That pithy statement that's supposed to tell me so much about the company -- tells me nothing. Except that their software is probably so gold-plated and over-engineered that it doesn't do what I want, and instead is robust and scalable to degrees I would probably never care to imagine.

Posted by Daiv Russell, Marketing Strategist at January 18, 2005 10:18 AM


...a bigger geek than their CEO? Whose CEO?
I don't get it. Maybe Logix is trying to differentiate itself from some competitor, but the point of reference is missing.
Looks like this ad is to reinforce the brand in the customer's mind, but if I don't know the brand beforehand then there's nothing to reinforce.

Posted by Gabriel Salcido at January 18, 2005 10:47 AM


Sounds like the perfect animal shelter billboard. Simple message that gets traffic in the door. One message. Clear. With the emotional hook of a cute cat photo. (And I say that as a dyed-in-the-wool dog guy.)

Posted by Sam at January 18, 2005 11:17 AM


I'd agree that the ad tells you nothing real about the products or the company, but it did stick with me enough to remember the company name.
Billboards don't tend to give you much information anyway and I'd say they are primarily of benefit in areas of impulse purchases, films, TV shows, promoting (already well-known) competing brand names and subsequently branding that name into your ad-full brain.
B2B advertising on billboards or TV has never really made much sense to me. Guess I've always hoped/thought that people in business who have marketing departments of their own have more sense than to believe the equivalents from someone else's department... but we're all human, eh?

But I know nothing about the world of advertising, so I'll bow to any superior knowledge on the subject :-)

Posted by Gary at January 18, 2005 12:36 PM


Why do I have this urge to buy the next billboard and put up, "Yeah, but our CEO can kick your CEO's *SS!"?

Gary, I agree that billboards don't make much sense in b2b. I'd love to talk to the marketing genius that thought this one up and ask him who is the target.

Customers?
Then why don't we know what you sell?

Stock holders?
Then where's your stock symbol?

Someone else?
Why?

Posted by Dustin at January 18, 2005 1:20 PM


samples for viagra I agree with Steve's reaction. Basically, Logix is telling you that you won't like the CEO (unless you are increadibly fond of "geeks"). And I don't believe that just because the guy is a geek, the company is somehow blessed or better off. If anything, that idea works against them.

Posted by Caroline at January 18, 2005 1:53 PM


The two ends of the empathetic bond continuim. MEOW!

Posted by Wendy at January 18, 2005 8:21 PM


Comedy in ads doesn't sell.

WIIFM?

Posted by Erick Blackwelder at January 18, 2005 11:08 PM


What I don't like about this ad is that it perpetuates the myth that the quality of the product and/or services is defined by how people perceive the CEO. It's important that people in the business in some way "embody" the brand values but this strikes me as putting the cart before the horse. Whether you think geekiness is good or bad, it seems to say, "You'll admire the CEO and therefore the products will be great." I couldn't care less whether the CEO is a geek or numbers-jockey or whatever else: do you have a funky product that answers my need? I also think it's counter-productive in the sense that it annoys me they think I might buy the goods simply because the CEO is a geek.. get outta here!

Posted by Mark JF at January 19, 2005 4:13 AM


I've thought more about it. This just doesn't make sense as a message to the end user. No mention of product or service, focus on the CEO who they could probably care less about, no call to action. Could this be an appeal to shareholders, stockholders, and Wall Street in general? If so, I don't understand why a billboard was the chosen medium.

Anyone seen this campaign in other media?

Posted by Dustin at January 19, 2005 12:17 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013 free viagra sample pack

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012 canada viagra mastercard

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

150 mg viagra

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

viagra express delivery in sydney - September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

viagra price comparison - December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

uk viagra no prescription

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

sale viagra for men

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.