Friday Edition
buy brand viagra in canada - May 2010
- December 2008 viagra in the states
buy viagra cheap usa viagra mg where to buy real viagra without prescriptionBefore blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
What we're talking about
on the front page.
Comments
20% - very impressive - talent and new IT rule the world.
Posted by John at February 9, 2005 12:32 PM
Its always great to see companies reinvesting in R&D, especially at high percentages like 20%. Thats about the same as Microsoft, spending 8 Billion per year on R&D with roughly 40Billion in revenue.
Posted by Matt at February 9, 2005 9:23 PM
John & Matt, I wish more people were commenting on this. It's a "simple" post--but I think of the utmost importantance. (More worthy than the Carly flap.)
Posted by tom peters at February 10, 2005 1:53 PM
I think it's a critical issue. I work in the UK Health Service - in R&D until a year or so ago when I moved to work on evaluation of modernisation initiatives. We spend less than 1% of turnover on R&D. Even when you add in money spent by the pharmaceutical industry and research charities the amount struggles to get to 5%. Is it any wonder that the level of innovation and customer care is so poor? R&D is seen as a peripheral activity, rather than being seen as one that drives things.
Posted by Stuart Eglin at February 10, 2005 6:04 PM
This is an absoutely impressive reinvestment into building future business - I do not think that there are many companies comparable in size to Hummingbird investing this high a percentage in R&D. It would be more insightful if we get to know what is classified as R&D ,the distribution of this amount - in terms of what goes to maintain existing product line and what goes for future rollouts- a good indicator would be to understand how many new rollouts have happened in the past 3/4 years and how much business new version/products/service are getting as a percentage of existing business - That way we can related the effect of lead indicator like r&d expense to lag indicators like sale % of new product offerings.
Posted by Sadagopan at February 11, 2005 6:59 AM
Sadagopan, you are of course right. Classification matters. (The basis of modern science, eh?) And I can't answer all your questions. But, assuming the accountants signed off, the HBird Annual Report reflects commonly accepted practice re R&D, and even if a couple of points were at debate, 20 (give or take) Rings My Chimes!
Posted by tom peters at February 12, 2005 10:28 AM
20% amazing - Dr. Tom - this points to our shared interest in education and development of TALENT - in the free agent nation we must spend about 1/5th of our time at least in personal DEVELOPment R&D.
Every day is a fabulous new day to learn and experience the latest.
Posted by Jack at February 12, 2005 7:39 PM