Tuesday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

100 Ways to Succeed #64:

Adopt the Wooden/CdSstandard!

Make each day a masterpiece!

Is your "next act" (presentation, goal statement for your current project) up to the Cirque du Soleil Standard? Is today a "Masterpiece"?

Tom Peters posted this on 02/28/05.

Comments

Leading an orchestra vs. playing in the band.

Posted by John at February 28, 2005 5:09 PM


A wise man once commented on the Airline industry and quality. If the tray table is broken what must the engine look like? To combine that with the Cirque du Soleil standard, we must ensure that everything reflects the standard not just a single project or speech. Many of us (you), that spend time on Tom’s site, have our own web presence or site. Does your site that represents you to 20,000 people a month (or more), reflect the Cirque du Soleil standard and perhaps more importantly reflect the quality of you. Personally, I keep a favorites list which is limited to ten sites that reflect the Cirque du Soleil standard. Each month I review these sites to remind myself what perfection looks like and how to bring that to my site.

Posted by RTodd at March 1, 2005 7:50 AM


I wish I knew what those ten sites were. I think everyone can use a daily reminder to be great. To be the best.

Posted by Rhona at March 1, 2005 5:48 PM


I added them on my blog site since I wasn't sure Tom would want that type of information posted here.

http://www.rtodd.com/blog/

Posted by RTodd at March 1, 2005 6:43 PM


RTodd, cross-blogging Rules! Thanks for the link, but give us a longer post with your sites enumerated here! This is precisely the sort of information we'd love posted here!

Posted by tom peters at March 2, 2005 7:54 AM


Design Matters, Passion Rules, and everything revolve around your story. The web represents not only your opportunity to be heard but to control the conversation. The following sites define what it means to excel in the message. I’ll pick out a couple of sites in the list and discuss.

http://www.graphicwise.com/
Wow, this may be my favorite sites for design. Notice the content of the sites can’t be much more than 10 pages. The site draws you in with the small hint of Flash technology and excellent navigation system. What emotions do you walk away with? (Professional, Detail Oriented, Design Excellence, and Simple) Your home page is like an elevator conversation, you got 30 seconds to get your message across and you better not screw it up or they won’t come back. I marvel at this site with its ability to deliver complexity and simplicity in a single framework.

http://www.mobilem.de/
This site has been on my list for the longest and I don’t speak or understand a word of Swedish. (Assuming that from the .de extension for Denmark). While some of the sites are top tens because of their content, you can’t say that about this one and that’s what makes it so special. The structure, navigation, images, and use of white space is perfect. What’s does it say about a site where you can’t read the text but you understand the message from the site structure. Could someone from Russia, who doesn’t know English, understand what you are about, your story, and your message.

While there are plenty of excuses for not being online, we must understand that if Nicholas Carr, Daniel Pink, Tom Peters, and others are even half right you had better get over those excuses and begin to define who you are and be able to communicate that on the web.

Posted by RTodd at March 2, 2005 9:33 AM


RTodd, thanks & on my way!

Posted by tom peters at March 3, 2005 2:45 AM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.