Wednesday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Branson

I have to admit to being a big Richard Branson fan. He's the ultimate entrepreneur who puts his money where his mouth is. For me, he epitomises the consumer champion—looking for situations where he feels the consumer is being ripped off, and trying to provide a better offering. He's taken on some big challenges, some with great success, others less so.

So the latest I read from Branson in amongst all the talk of fuel price protests in the UK last week, was a tiny snippet in the Guardian newspaper entitled JR Branson. He's only thinking of building his own refinery, to cut the cost of jet fuel and thus the price of an air ticket!!

WOW! Could he really beat the oil giants at their own game? He's done well with his airline, but is this a bite too big to chew off?

Madeleine McGrath posted this on 09/20/05.

Comments

Well lets hope so, Branson is an easy guy to support because despite being an icon of multinational business, he has a certain 'underdog' appeal.

His actions seem to be carried out in the greater public interest.

And I suppose it's basic economics, the more players there are in the market, the lower the price will get (perhaps, hopefully).

Posted by mark at September 20, 2005 6:21 PM


Well, sure... with a lot of money and a good dose of talent

In order to build a refinery, you need a good EPC (Engineering, procurement and construction) contractor. The technology needed can be bought from a number of global giants - Shell, Dow, ABB Lummus to name a few.

You need to get adequate supplies of crude, and a team that can buy crude efficiently.. (which I've been informed is more art than science)

There are tons of people in the UK, Ireland, India and the Middle East who could start up and run the refinery.

The tough part is distribution.. To be successful as a refinery, the size of the refinery has to be of enormous capacity. There is only so much that Virgin airlines can consume on it's own.. Besides Airplanes run on crappy fuel - a mix that's like kerosene. The major margins on fuel are made on gasoline, diesel and so on.. which airlines can't consume. So he needs a strong partner who will invest in petrol stations, or an existing player to buy the fuel from him. In Europe (or rather in the Netherlands), it's almost impossible now to get permission from local authorities to build petrol stations. He might have better luck in the US and Asia.

Dhirubhai Ambani and his sons in India successfully backward integrated from selling polyester blend clothing to petroleum products to oil refining to oil exploration. The company he founded is called Reliance, one of India's best run companies. They've now branched into several other industries as well.

So it's possible to make this work for Branson.

Posted by Arun Sadhashivan at September 21, 2005 12:22 AM


Arun,

I agree with you only to the extent that Shri Dhirubhai Ambani had created a wonderful enterprise called RELIANCE but am afraid & as u r aware, RELIANCE has now been split between the Ambani brothers (Mukesh ultimately getting the larger share of the pie by virtue of being the older bro!) and looks like the ADAE - Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Entp(group of cos' owned / controlled / managed by Anil) is yet to prove its mettle.....and who knws maybe there culd be another IPO in the offing...jus to make Anil personally well off than Mukesh!!.....That being said, Shri.Dhirubai Ambani was TRULY a visionary & a legend during his times and WILL DEFINITELY be remembered for:-
a) The wealth he has created
b) Making RELIANCE one of the Best Managed companies in the country (INDIA)
c) For not bequeathing the will - i.e. intestate which ultimately led to the split between the brothers & one hellova tussle & rough patch for the world to witness...ultimately i bet the MEDIA did one hellova job narrating the ghastly episodes in entirety!

Posted by K.Sriram at September 21, 2005 12:52 AM


Watch this space!! - Anything is possible with Richard Branson. I hope we Brits all support the great man. Sir Richard has that wonderful and almost unique quality of remaining refreshingly 'ordinary' and firmly rooted in reality as traditional management institutions try desperately to make him conform to what I call 'dull speak.' He speaks such simple common sense it is so refreshing. As a leader he is a role model for all and by the way I bet there is not an MBA in sight on his CV.

Posted by Trevor Gay at September 21, 2005 2:04 AM


I am afraid "conmsumer champion" is a very wrong label for this guy.

Have you ever travelled on one of his trains? Or dealt with his bank?

We should also not ignore the that working conditions for his employees are said to be pretty nasty, too.

Posted by ingo at September 21, 2005 2:40 AM


Yep Ingo I regularly travel on Virgin trains and they are approximately 1000% better than the competitors in my expereince - sure they are not perfect but they are getting better all the time. I haven't dealt with Virgin bank but I have flown on Virgin planes and never had cause to complain. I don't know anything aobut the staff conditions but I use the Virgin Gym in my local town and the staff there are brilliant - they also seem very motivated. We all have different perceptions of quality and I genuinely respect what you say - my experience of Virgin has been excellent so far :-)

Posted by Trevor Gay at September 21, 2005 3:16 AM


The problem will be the infrastructure costs. Their are only 5 refineries in the UK, spread geographically around the country. These are linked to terminals located in most major urban areas via underground pipelines which reduce the distribution costs dramatically.

Nb, All UK Oil companies purchase each others product because of this, ie the BP refinery is in Scotland, therfore regardless of the petrol station branding in Scotland the fuel will be from the BP refinery. Esso in the South East etc.

Branson's problem would not be selling his product but distributing it effectively. Pipelines will have to be built to oil terminals. This would present a major barrier to enter into this market.

Posted by Mark Wilkins at September 21, 2005 5:13 AM


This is just an example of vertical integration that could repay itself early as an investment through selling excess fuel to other players. I suspect that in the future we could also see Virgin petrol stations. A point that I have not seen mentioned is where will this facility be located? That could have a big impact on the initial cost of investment and any savings generated as a result. With UK oil supplies dwindling, I suspect that the location will be elsewhere.

Posted by Simon Paul at September 21, 2005 7:16 AM


Branson is just the guy we need to get some more refining capacity available. I totally support the idea, since no one else seems to be able to get the job done. When he puts his mind to a problem, it usually gets solved.

We could have all the crude oil in the world but with no refineries....no gas.

Cheers

Posted by Karen Sieczka at September 21, 2005 8:04 AM


Yes to Branson and his dreamweaver lifestyle - especially when it concerns big oil and the way they rip us off consistently with their record profits!

Luckily I'm able to have a home based career ... so oil energy consumption is minimal! Stay radical out there - run/walk!

Posted by Sean at September 21, 2005 8:46 AM


We seem to have a variety of reactions here, both pragmatic and emotional.

Looking at the pragmatic first, I think one of Branson's great skills is that he doesn't try to be an expert himself, he goes out to find people in the know who have the same mindset as he does. The article from the Guardian says that is precisely what he is doing in this case - and this team of experts will no doubt have a good grip of what the realities of this market opportunity. Like a number of respondents here, I really hope he can pull it off!

I do have to react to the rather stinging comment about his existing companies. I actually have a Virgin Bank Account (known as a One Account) and I am not only happy with it, I am delighted. It's a fabulous product and the service is great. And as someone who has worked as a consultant to Virgin companies, I have yet to come across an employee who felt the Virgin approach to them was pretty nasty. Like Trevor, my experience has always been positive. I know that they have a policy of paying the market rate, not higher, but they continue to be a very popular employer with job applicants. It seems they don't need to pay over the odds for the well motivated people they are able to attract.

Posted by Madeleine McGrath at September 21, 2005 9:31 AM


Aw, shucks, and I thought you was gonna write about Branson Missouruh. Y'all ever been to their Mel Tillis theater there?

Posted by Ron at September 21, 2005 9:56 AM


I think that people hold the impression that retailing Petrol & Diesel is profitable. The margins are extremely low, only a few pence per litre. Most small - medium service stations make more money from their other retailing activities ie confectionary etc than from the fuel sold.

The petrol retail market is dwindling with all major players reducing the number of service stations, in part due to the very small margins and the huge volumes required to make anything substantial. This is in conjunction with supermarkets selling petrol & diesel as a loss leader.

It would be strange move for any new players, even Richard Branson to enter this market!!

The oil majors make their huge profits from refining and then effectively selling the product to themseleves, together with other independant oil companies.

Posted by Mark Wilkins at September 21, 2005 10:45 AM


I think this is a great move. All it takes is money and he doesn't even have to sell his refined fuel to anyone besides Virgin to realize a profit.

As for poor working conditions for employees...people choose their employment and what this man is doing, is creating employment. Adds value to the company, adds value to the economy.

Brilliant.

Posted by Josh at September 21, 2005 3:52 PM


Let's hope that he does make a success of his refining venture. I've used the trains, bought the records and spent money in his shops too.

Even my email's from Virgin and whilst there were problems with spam around 18 months ago, I've stayed with it and closed my Yahoo! and Hotmail accounts that I used to use whilst travelling.

Branson's an astute businessman and it's been interesting to hear what employees have said about him. I interviewed legendary radio DJ Tommy Vance before the launch of Virgin Radio and one of his comments about working for a Branson company was that it was 'staffed by people who do give a s**t'...

Posted by Keith Rickaby at September 21, 2005 4:42 PM


Sean - think you and I can start a campaign to persuade Branson to put his drilling project off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, or in the ANWR wilderness of Alaska?

I love you man.

Posted by Ron at September 21, 2005 4:47 PM


Virgin is a powerfull brand. If anyone can take on the oil giants its Branston. He may not win the fight but will surely change the way we see Oil companies as I'm sure he will reveal a few trade secrets if he does go ahead.

Posted by Andre Googe at September 23, 2005 5:05 AM


Cool! That is sure to give the term "Virgin Oil" a brand new meaning .. Simon Paul comment on Virgin Petrol Station sure sounded like another good channel to market the other Virgin products .. Virgin Cola / Virgin Banking / Virgin Music ..

However, hope he remembers his failed attempt to penetrate Singapore's mobile market with his Virgin Mobile venture. Anyway, it was a tough market here for the mobile market. Since there are only 4 Mil S'poreans and that includes foreign workers. In addition, the market is dominated by 3 Telco Operator with deep Govt links ..

Watever it might be .. I really wish Sir Branson all the best .. he is an entrepreneur that I deeply respect ..

Posted by Edmund at September 25, 2005 3:09 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.