Docs with crappy bedside manner are getting whacked, big time, according to the November 30 New York Times. About time, I say.
More and more group-practice compensation plans are docking docs—or rewarding them—based on patient satisfaction measures. For instance: Rochester Independent Practice Association ... 20% of docs' pay (3,000 docs) is based on patient satisfaction measures. Tufts Health Plan ... 3K to 4K docs lost all or part of their bonuses last year because of low C.Sat. #s. California Medical Association ... a $30,000,000 pot will be divvied up among 35K docs based on C.Sat. scores—the consequences could run $5,000 per doc.
Typical statements patients respond to: "Is easy to talk with"; "Is very familiar with my medical history"; "Takes time to answer my questions"; "Listens carefully to me"; "Is someone I feel I can trust."
(NB: This ties in nicely with my recent rant on the applicability of "business" thinking to the world of non-profits.)
Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
What we're talking about
on the front page.