Boomer & Geezer Women = Many, Many, Many People = Major-Primary Market for Everything = Primary Market+ For Everything Expensive = In Their Prime And Gathering Steam = Seriously Cool = Money, All Of.
So, please explain why last Sunday's New York Times Women's Fashion Spring 2006 section did not even include one model that (I would think) a Boomer-Geezer Woman would identify with? I am sure-as-hell not suggesting that Boomer-Geezer women are not stylish. To the contrary, speaking as a 60-year-old+ male, there's no one sexier than a seriously cool 45-, 55-, 65-year-old woman! She's in her prime. (I'm not.) And she looks confidant and ready to take on & take over the world. But she (sure-as-hell) doesn't look like any of the humanoids sporting clothes in that fashion section of the Times. I'll be the first to admit that I am not "allowed" to be a judge on this topic—except for the stupendous nature of the market opportunity. Somebody/s—preferably women—please, please, please explain!
Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
What we're talking about
on the front page.