Tuesday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Event: WIN

The Wisconsin Innovation Network is where Tom is speaking today. Otherwise known as WIN. Nice acronym, don't you think? The slides are here: Final Version and Long Version.

Cathy Mosca posted this on 03/29/06.

Comments

WINNERS NEVER QUIT; QUITTERS NEVER WIN

Posted by K.Sriram at March 29, 2006 11:06 PM


POOR TOM!. When I read that Tom Peters, perhaps the greatest business motivator around was going to speak to WIN, I almost fell over. Wisconsin isn't about innovation. It’s the epitome of conservatism and maintaining the Status Que. Over the past 5 years you could count the number of VC deals done in that state on one hand. Governor Doyle sponsored his Smart Growth plan and section 255 but they, and the department of commerce in WI restrict only giving money (albeit tax breaks only) to investors who have invested in one of three areas: Agriculture, IT, and Manufacturing. In my opinion these three industries going no where fast. Provided, that may be an argument for investing in them, but why throw good money after bad.

This is an experiential economy we are in, those three industries don’t typically understand that. More than 62% of those companies in WI don’t even have a CMO. In the state of WI more than 72% of the businesses are service based and we all know the situation globalization is creating for WI in those three areas. WI also has a serious problem with Brain Drain. With one of the nations best education systems the kids there are smart but leaving the state for better opportunities. Recruiting top tier talent to WI is a major problem and the talent pool for superstars in any industry sums up the phrase "Qualified Labor Pool Shortage".

I feel sorry for Tom. He is going to speak to a bunch of people who don't get it. At least he will be well paid.

Someone in WI needs to step up, check their watch and realize what’s going on out there. Business has a pulse and WI has a very faint one at best.

Yes WIN is a great acronym, but you can’t WIN by doing nothing.

Posted by Mr. Stacy Gentile at March 30, 2006 10:01 AM


Mr. Gentile may have a point - Wisconsin is not known for high flyers. He is also unaware of the shear volume of bio-tech work going on in SE WI. Yes, Madison has a lot of medical and biological people, and they are doing all sorts of commercialization with it. right here in my tiny corner, Racine, there is a lot more going on than meets any eyes. I see only a small part of that.

And yes, these people are 'conservative' and arguably a bit backward. They also listen when I tell them that all we have with which to compete for our survival is our Lake Michigan, and our brains. The application of all of those brains, in low profile and some high profile ways, may save us. Nothing else will.

Now, if Mr. Gentile has some specifics, for each firm and situation, I and my acquaintances would like to hear them.

Jay Warner, author of the A2Q Method ™

The A2Q Method - what do you want to improve today?

Posted by Jay Warner at March 31, 2006 1:11 PM


It was a real pleasure to listen to Mr. Peters at the WIN conference. He presented several interesting perspectives on business and business trends, and my colleagues and I got a lot out of it. He was in good company too - other speakers at the conference:

President, Trek Bicycles
Chairman & CEO, Johnson Outdoors
President & COO, Harley-Davidson
Vice President, Johnson Controls
President & CEO, Northwestern Mutual
President, Ariens Company

All of whose (Wisconsin) companies should rightly be considered innovative. When we think about it, innovation should be defined in a broad context. A biotech firm might go nowhere; venture capitalists might lose their shirts. Lean manufacturing practices at a lawn mower company don't sound sexy, but they can (and do) generate profits in the millions. It's not about your industry or your location - it's about your approach and your execution. I think Mr. Peters would agree with that.

Posted by John Erskine III at March 31, 2006 7:17 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.