Tuesday Edition
On a trip away from Lake Wobegon, Garrison Keillor took time to talk to us at tompeters.com. He and Erik had a great conversation about his latest book, A Christmas Blizzard, and many other topics, including a note from Julie Christie. We know you'll enjoy reading his Cool Friends interview.
|
Announcements | XML
Blogging | XML
Brand You | XML
Branding | XML
Cool Friends | XML
Design | XML
Education | XML
Entrepreneurs | XML
Excellence | XML
Execution | XML
General | XML
Healthcare | XML
Innovation | XML
Leadership | XML
Marketing | XML
Markets | XML
News | XML
Service | XML
Strategies | XML
Success Tips | XML
Talent | XML
Technology | XML
Tom's Slides | XML
Tom's Travels | XML
Trend$ | XML
What Tom's Reading | XML
WOW! Projects | XML
Get the Blog Feed
Get the Comments RSS
What is RSS?
The 26th Story
800-CEO-Read
Ageless Marketing
andHow To Reach Women
Katya Andresen
Tom Asacker
Asiabizblog
Jordan Ayan
Martha Barletta
Dave Barry
Ed Batista
Becker-Posner
The Big Picture
The Bing Blog
Blog Critics
John Bogle
BoingBoing
Boomer411
Brand Autopsy
Chris Brogan
BusinessPundit
BW Brand New Day
BW Management IQ
BW The Tech Beat
Cali and Jody
Ben Casnocha
Change This
Church of the Customer
Clear Path International
Conversation Agent
Cooking for Engineers
Copy Blogger
Core77
Coudal Partners
Mark Cuban
Aubrey Daniels
Design Gazette, jkr.co.uk
design*sponge
Jory Des Jardins
Betsy Devine
Don the Idea Guy
Dooce
Down the Avenue
Daniel W. Drezner
Esther Dyson
eHub
Frank Eliason
Judith Ellis
English Cut
Enterprise Media
Evhead
Steve Farber
Fast Company
Fast Lane
Brad Feld
The Fischbowl
Richard Florida
Ze Frank
Freakonomics
Free Business Tips
Gil Friend
gapingvoid
Dan Gillmor
Global Neighborhoods
Seth Godin
Good Experience
Gothamist
Great Leadership
Alan Gregerman
Health Affairs
Health Beat
The Health Care Blog
Dick Heller
Hyperthinker
IDEO Eyes Open
iinnovate
Influx Insights
Innovate on Purpose
In Pursuit of Elegance
Instapundit
The Intuitive Life
Isenblog
Joi Ito
Rich Karlgaard/Forbes
Josh Kaufman
Guy Kawasaki
Leading Blog
Learned on Women
Jonah Lehrer
Martin Lindstrom
Chris Locke
The Long Tail
Made to Stick
John Maeda
Management by Baseball
MarketingProfs:DailyFix
Marketing to Boomer Women
Mavericks at Work
The Messaging Times
Metacool
Nick Morgan
Name Wire
Mike Neiss
Netwoman
No Bullet Points
The Nudge Blog
Nuts about Southwest
John O'Leary
Persistence Unlimited
Personal Branding
Dan Pink
Pink Slip
Play the Game of Life
Pollster
John Porcaro
Portfolio Careers
Virginia Postrel
Power Line
Presentation Zen
PSFK
Pyromarketing
Mitch Ratcliffe
Fred Reichheld
ResearchBuzz
Retailer Blog
Jennifer Rice
Dan Roam
Kevin Roberts
Scott Rosenberg
Rules of Thumb
Samizdata
Ian Sanders
Tim Sanders
Todd Sattersten
Mary Schmidt
Robert Scoble
Scripting News
Doc Searls
Andy Sernovitz
Rajesh Setty
Stephen Shapiro
Signal vs. Noise
Slashdot
Simplicity
Smart Mobs
Sorted Books
Springwise
Halley Suitt
Andrew Sullivan
Sustainable Work
Bob Sutton
The Talent Code
TechCrunch
The Technium
Third Age
Trend Hunter
Trend Watching
Trump University
Penelope Trunk
Trusted Advisor
Twist Image
Web Worker Daily
David Weinberger
What's Next
Susan Willett Bird
The Wisdom of Improv
WonderBranding
Wooster Collective
Steve Yastrow
Your White Room
Or: Don't Overlook the "Missing Ninety-eight Percent"!

Time to come out of the closet!
I care!
(I'm right.)
(I'm pretty sure.)
(Damn sure.)
I posted recently "Mike Vs Tom" about "Mike's" (Mike Porter's) preference for STRATEGY as business' primary explanatory variable. I said mine was EXECUTION (or, preferably, Execution + People) (or, preferably, Execution + People + Enthusiasm + Excellence) (or, preferably, Execution + People + Customers + Enthusiasm + Excellence).
Some who made Comments (Thank you!) said it was obviously not an "either-or" issue. You need both.
Of course you do.
Maybe.
I, in fact, do not denigrate the usefulness of a thoughtful strategy. It's just that it is ... Crystal Clear (to me!) that strategy is in fact unequivocally subordinate to Execution Excellence/Execution Mania/Bias for Action (the latter happens to be "Basic #1" from In Search of Excellence).
More broadly, my money rests on what I'll call the "Infrastructure of Excellence": Superstar People ... Customer Love ... Execution Mania ... Boundless Energy & Enthusiasm ... Relentless Pursuit of Excellence per se.
Consider U.S. Grant. (My favorite topic of late.) General Grant was an "action addict." He constitutionally had to be on the move. Grant won several battles when the Union victory tank was on Empty. Grant had many a detractor, and one principal supporter—Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln had a "strategy," but it was in tatters because of timid-defensive-incompetent generals. Then, via "execution mania"/"bias for action"/"execution excellence" Grant quickly (What else?) chalked up several unexpected victories in the West: In essence, Lincoln's "strategy" became the exploitation of Grant's growing string of victories. Thence "execution excellence" opportunistically shaped & drove & took precedence over any grand conception of strategy.
Exhibit #2: Jack Welch, subject of a recent Post (& so much more). He is a presumed "strategic genius." I think unequivocally that his "genius" (& GE's in general) was/is ... Execution Mania & Inspired People Development. (And: Energy & Relentlessness.) Of course there's more to the story. Or is there? (Welch was famous for #1, #2, fix or sell—surely that ain't strategy, but a call to relentless action—or else.)
Let's introduce a (to me) closely related "debate."
First: "Strategy" vs "Execution." Next up another sacred elephant: "Leadership" VERSUS "Management." Stupid idea of the decade: "Managers do things right. Leaders do the right thing."
Why stupid? Because "great" leaders are greatest at "doin' stuff"—Grant & Welch redux. "Mere" and unloved "management" is ... as I see it ... the "dull" "do it" variable in the success equation. But in the popular formulation, "sexy" "leadership" is de facto equated with woo-woo Strategy (capital "S"). Management's the "anti-intellectual stuff you wouldn't wish on your hated Cousin Doris."
When we equate strategy with leadership we have entered the ... Dumb Zone. Churchill, it is said, was a lousy strategist—but a genius at "inspiring" a nation waaaaay down on its luck to determined and sustained action.
So? Frankly, with Churchill & Welch & Grant as models, I don't give a tinker's damn whether the leader is a "genius" strategist or not. I want my "genius" "leader" to embrace-embody*:
Energy!
Enthusiasm!
Execution Mania!
Inspired People Selection & Development!
Customer Love!
Passion for Excellence!
(*It's the so-called "soft stuff"—but that's another story. Conventional wisdom: Strategy & Numbers = HARD. People & Implementation = SOFT. Aye, the Smell of Idiots is again in the air!)
So leadership ... TO ME ... is pretty much "everything but strategy." That overstates ... but maybe not that much.
I'll go down with my ship on my priority-precedence order: "First" ... Energy-Enthusiasm-Relentlessness-Excellence-Execution-People-Customer Love. "Second" ... whatever (strategy, if you wish).
Bottom line:
Strategy ... last.
"Management" ... rocks.
XX (eXecution, eXcellence) ... rules.
Leaders embrace-embody-exude ... "soft" stuff.
There, I've said it.
Your turn ...
******
Do you love this quote as much as I do? It's from former McKinsey Managing Director Al McDonald, addressing a consulting team: "Never forget implementation, boys. In our work it's what I call the 'missing 98 percent' of the client puzzle."
Love that! Execution-Action-Implementation: THE "MISSING NINETY-EIGHT PERCENT"!
******
(Attached is a PowerPoint titled "Management Versus Leadership?" I've included in it the latest & updated version of "Grant" and, on the topic of execution, a PP titled "Bossidy.")
(Oh yeah, at the top is a 7AM photo from my morning row on Lake St Catherine—about 6 miles from my VT farm.)
Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
What we're talking about
on the front page.
Comments
Posted by cathy mosca at July 21, 2006 9:24 AM
Posted by Trevor Gay at July 21, 2006 9:30 AM
Posted by Marcelo Goldstein at July 21, 2006 9:58 AM
Posted by Andrew Hayden at July 21, 2006 10:32 AM
Posted by Greg Kittinger at July 21, 2006 10:52 AM
Posted by PaulH at July 21, 2006 11:12 AM
Posted by shohra at July 21, 2006 11:14 AM
Posted by sean at July 21, 2006 11:59 AM
Posted by ann michael at July 21, 2006 12:03 PM
Posted by ann michael at July 21, 2006 12:12 PM
Posted by Trevor at July 21, 2006 12:32 PM
Posted by sean at July 21, 2006 12:52 PM
Posted by Paul at July 21, 2006 1:07 PM
Posted by Wally Bock at July 21, 2006 1:13 PM
Posted by Richard Cauley at July 21, 2006 1:59 PM
Posted by Al at July 21, 2006 2:50 PM
Posted by Mike Neiss at July 21, 2006 6:49 PM
Posted by Dan Feliciano at July 22, 2006 9:23 AM
Posted by sean at July 22, 2006 3:36 PM
Posted by K at July 22, 2006 4:16 PM
Posted by steve chandler at July 22, 2006 4:27 PM
Posted by Desh at July 22, 2006 10:57 PM
Posted by Desh at July 22, 2006 11:05 PM
Posted by pete stafford at July 23, 2006 3:22 AM
Posted by PaulH at July 23, 2006 5:10 AM
Posted by Desh at July 23, 2006 8:44 AM
Posted by ann michael at July 23, 2006 9:23 AM
Posted by Horst Schueberl at July 23, 2006 10:34 AM
Posted by Jeff Pasquale at July 23, 2006 1:16 PM
Posted by Richard Cauley at July 23, 2006 2:45 PM
Posted by K.Sriram at July 23, 2006 6:58 PM
Posted by Trevor Gay at July 24, 2006 2:50 AM
Posted by MarkJF at July 24, 2006 3:25 AM
Posted by Eric Pennington at July 24, 2006 6:59 AM
Posted by Jodee Bock at July 24, 2006 8:13 AM
Posted by Starbucker at July 24, 2006 8:34 AM
Posted by MarkJF at July 24, 2006 10:16 AM
Posted by PaulH at July 24, 2006 10:21 AM
Posted by Darryl Carlton at July 24, 2006 5:41 PM
Posted by Dave Sovde at July 28, 2006 8:30 PM