Thursday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Down with scripting

I see a trend going in the right direction ...

In companies where front-line employees have direct customer contact, it's common for there to be a "12-step process" or "19-point customer service checklist" that tells employees what they have to do when they meet a customer. Often, these companies hire people to pose as customers and rate employee compliance on these steps. I heard a story of a hotel front desk clerk who received an apology at check-out from one of these hired "blind" shoppers who said, "You were one of the best people I've seen in this company, but I'm going to have to give you a bad grade because you skipped a lot of steps."

Ugh. Not surprisingly, when I work with front-line employees at companies like this they tell me how silly the scripted processes are. One company I worked with had a 38-step process. Luckily, none of the employees I interviewed knew what the 38 steps were.

The good news ... I'm starting to see companies realize the folly of this rigid employee scripting. Recent comment from the operations V.P. of a client company: "We don't need a 16-step process. We need one step: Connect with the customer."

Is this a trend that is really happening? If so, is it all good, or am I missing something?

Steve Yastrow posted this on 09/06/06.

Comments

Steve, so spot one !! - Down with Scipting !!

Last year we had this program that was called "whats the 20 most stupidest things, that we ask you to do" -- one of the things which popped up was "why scripts" - we can speak intelligently and we dont like behaving like robots !!

Posted by /pd at September 6, 2006 7:37 PM


And ... it's so obvious to customers when an employee is speaking from a script. The employee feels disconnected, and so does the customer.

Posted by Steve Yastrow at September 6, 2006 7:52 PM


Think of this in sync with John O'leary's post below about employee engagement. How can an employee be engaged when forced to recite a 17 point script?

Posted by Steve Yastrow at September 6, 2006 7:57 PM


Steve, I'm sure I'm not the only one who's desperately trying to get off the phone with a call center rep (while I try not to be rude) as s/he scrolls through the closing message steps like
"We really appreciate your business, Mr O."
"Is there anything else I can help you with today, Mr O?"
"I want to thank you for calling XYZ today, Mr O."
"But before you go, I'd like to tell you about our latest offer..."
"No? Well, we really appreciate your business, Mr O."
"Is there anything else I..."
ARRRRUUUUUUGGGGHHHH
I recognize that not everyone wants their transactions completed at warp speed and some customers will put up with some verbosity in exchange for some "connection," but I might actually switch vendors if I could find some that dispensed with the social niceties to shave 20 seconds off my calls with them.

Posted by John OLeary at September 6, 2006 11:40 PM


I'd prefer that they shave time off my call by knowing who I am (by the "x" digit number I already gave them), knowing what I've bought from them and any past issues I might have had, knowing when I last called, etc. They should take the time to connect. It doesn't need to be long and flowery - just know my stuff and act like you actually care about my business with you. Connection made!

The worst part about scripts is that CSR's often don't know what to do if your issue isn't covered by one of their scripts. I once had a Dell rep read me the same script 3 times. Even though it didn't do the job the first two times she kept going! I couldn't get her to stop.

When someone gets customer service right - it's a beautiful (and time-saving) thing.

Posted by ann michael at September 6, 2006 11:48 PM


CSRs need to own the company - they need to think, talk, and act like CEOs/ CMOs / CTOs, if they are to deliver perfect customer experiences - and CSRs like that are hard to come by!

Jay, from Bangalore

Posted by Jayakumar Hariharan at September 7, 2006 12:32 AM


In my last job, part of my duties included running a small (8 person) Customer Service team and I was tasked by my boss with producing some "standard scripts." I have to confess I wasn't against the idea at the time. However, I spoke about it with the team and, to a person, they were vehemently against it. (Surprise!) What they couldn't understand, and I was unable to explain to myself or them, was what we were really trying to achieve. Why is a "uniform customer experience" such a great goal - are there any uniform customers? And no, no one had complained about the way they were being handled by the team. And didn't the company trust them to do the key things (apart from being polite and helpful) like listening for other sales opportunities? So would a script and layers of checking really improve anything?

In the end, our script was a uniform greeting ("Company X, good morning, I'm Julie, how can I help you?") After that, it was left to them to resolve the call.

Posted by MarkJF at September 7, 2006 1:30 AM


Aaargh ... I got the biggest rollocking of my professional life because for 2 months running the mystery shopper report on my team ticked the "no" box for the "did they use customer name?" question. Still, no recognition for the 48 out of 50 correct boxes ticked, at least 23 of which are totally irrelevant to developing a personal service experience for the customer. I changed jobs 3 months later.

Posted by Dave at September 7, 2006 5:02 AM


Front-line staff need to realize that a personal touch or a personal connection with the customer is the best thing to do at all times (and especially during troubled times!) which ultimately makes the customer feel delighted and privileged thereby creating a very momentous user-experience (from the customers’ view-point) and a sense of personal success / accomplishment (from the frontline staffs’ point-of-view). So, it’s a “WIN-WIN” situation for everyone!

I love this quote by Jeff Bezos – “We see our customers as invited guests to a party, and we are the hosts. It's our job every day to make every important aspect of the customer experience a little bit better.”

Posted by K.Sriram at September 7, 2006 5:37 AM


That's an interestig topic you brought here. This reminds me a concept they use in the East: "non-duality - duality - and non-duality again".

For instance, when one comes to study karate, if attacked, at first one reacts spontaneously and intuitively, demonstrating what is often called beginner's luck. But next he is being taught all those extremely complex stuff about how to move and breath (which is a rough equivalent of 13-step processes here). At this stage the student becomes unsure of himself and tries to do complex things consiously - which is impossible - losing his efficiency dramatically. However, at the next stage he incorporates all the lessons as a part of himself, becoming unconsionsly competent and whole, non-dual again.

As they say, one stops "doing" and "becomes it". In your example, one stops conecting to the customer because his job requires it and connects because he simply can not act otherwise. Because he is just a person who LOVES to connect. At this point skill becomes a highly valued art.

The question is: how do you become that kind of a person? Should you follow the 13-step process first or you can skip that part? What are the other options available? Is this a question of choosing the right job? Does this all mean customer service trainig is completely irrelevant?

Posted by Alexei Kapterev at September 7, 2006 5:42 AM


Customer Service reps though can be FUN - I always ask them what else they can offer relating to travel, credit cards, cell phones, Nordstroms, Nike, et al - AND it is surprising the things they'll give away in the name of CS.

AND I ask them where they are located and what IT equipment/systems they use - some fun/useful ideas there - new FREE things to learn.

Posted by sean at September 7, 2006 8:24 AM


The only script that's needed is, "Hi! This is Jane. how may I help you today?" This is assuming, of course, that the CSR has been hired because s/he has a great personality, has been fully trained in the company's products and services, and knows who to contact if s/he doesn't know the answers. Usually, the reason for poor customer service is because the company has skimped on training and the CSR couldn't find the answers even if s/he wanted to.

Posted by Tracy at September 7, 2006 9:13 AM


Back in the day when I worked with/marketeed call center services, we always said, "Hire for attitude first." If the person doesn't have the right attitude and perspective, all the scripts in the world won't help.

That said, there should be a guide (not a script written in granite) to help the rep, not hinder them. Who to call when there's a higher level technical issue, etc. etc.

Posted by Mary Schmidt at September 7, 2006 9:15 AM


1. Hire friendly/helpful people.
2. Indoctrinate them with company culture/goals.
3. Teach them how to use the necessary tools of their job.
4. Let them show you they know how to do the job. If not, coach some more.
5. Get out of their way.
6. Get their input on how to improve service once they've been on the front line awhile.
7. Stay connected with them and repeat steps 2 through 7 from now on.

Posted by Randy Cantrell at September 7, 2006 9:53 AM


If the script is helpful, use it. If it's not, get rid of it. Most of the scripts that I have had to use (and there have been many) are command and control devices. There were two, however, that were carefully crafted to train and encourage competence and mastery.

Your customers will let you know soon enough if what you are saying and doing works or not.

Thanks for the post; it has encouraged me to re-think my positions on both being a customer and how to better treat my customers.

Posted by Kate at September 7, 2006 10:37 AM


Listening is the greatest skill and tool any brand representative possesses--from CEO to CSR to cashier. (Is their an abbreviation for that position?) How can a script, which drives forever onward to the next scripted response/question regardless of what a customer says, be useful or customer-focused?

Posted by Lewis Green at September 7, 2006 10:58 AM


1. Be Authentic
2. Have Fun
3. Provide Extra Value

Posted by sean at September 7, 2006 11:35 AM

viagra free sample pack

It's all about TALENT! (where have we heard that before?).

The modern belief in the perfectability of systems, scripts, policies and procedures seems to have no grounding in fact, and yet it is embraced and acted upon all over the place. There is certainly a place for good processes, but deviation from the script ought to be recognized as a sign of initiative and intelligence... and rewarded, not punished or criticized.

It seems to me that the system is broken, it's always been broken, and always will be broken. No matter how good we make it, there will always be room for improvment and creative initiative by thinking, talented people.

I could be wrong...

Posted by Dan Ward at September 7, 2006 1:14 PM


I agree with Ritz-Carlton:
1. "We are ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen."
2. Listen to the customer and do whatever it takes to satisfy the customer.
3. When a customer hands you a problem, you own it until the customer is happy.

Posted by Erick Blackwelder at September 7, 2006 10:04 PM


I much prefer "Topics to cover" or bullet pointed reminder checklists to scripts that way you can ensure some process (they have remembered to get all the details) but they can do it in their own words and sort out what is relevant or not

Posted by PaulH at September 8, 2006 5:08 AM


Great topic Steve.

Working with unemployed years back I had a young teenager get a job with a telemarketing company, she dropped in to visit me distressed after a week, not getting any sales.... then showed me the SCRIPT from HELL!

We turned it into bullet points so she could jump to any one of them to handle questions etc... Next day she was back, 7 sales next day 14!

The boss applauded the results and told the others at the weekly meeting "See what happens when you stick to the script!" HA!

Remember the points, trash the linkin' bits...

Posted by Steve Gray at September 9, 2006 5:41 AM


"I'm starting to see companies realize the folly of this rigid employee scripting. Is this a trend that’s really happening?"

Steve,

This is a very interesting question. In our consulting practice we're finding companies are loosening the grip on CSR scripting. In fact, we're beginning to find them concentrating more on the outcome than on their methodology. We think iIt's definitely a trend in companies and its time has come.

It's also a new trend for individuals in business, especially those doing business development. For more than 20 years, as a sales trainer, I harped on scripting - "get your script right'- and closing strategies, and then trained hundreds of people in those techniques. That was then, this is now, and things have changed.

There's a new, more humanistic wave afoot in the selling industry and it's adjusted my thinking, my behavior, and my results.

No longer are we putting potential clients in a sales 'process', and we've thrown away every script and canned language we can find.

This new wave is about being 'real' with customers, respecting them as people, and removing pressure from any transaction, whether it's negotiating new work or even making a cold call.

You may want to check out Ari Galper's Unlock the Game: http://www.unlockthegame.com/ He's removed scripting for good and it was truly a breath of fresh air.

Posted by Jerry Gasché at September 15, 2006 12:06 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013 best canadian viagra prices online

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

buy viagra with paypal uk

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

paypal viagra in canada

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

viagra online overnight

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007 viagra pfizer online

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

buy viagra online 25mg

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006 viagra in usa

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001 the new alternative drug to viagra

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

pfizer viagra 100mg

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

where to buy viagra in canada

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.