Thursday Edition
It's obvious.
It's boring.
But it's also neither of those things.
It's actually stunning.
Headline, right column, page 1, Wall Street Journal, 27 November 2006: "Seeking an Edge, Big Investors Turn to Network of Informants. Mark Gerson Assembles Web of Moonlighting Managers."
I suppose in the old days (pre-1995, say) investors or investors' reps could have hung out at bars near plants to ask hair-down workers or even bosses what was going on inside. In fact, there's no doubt they did just that. So "this" is not new—but as usual these days, "Internet Scale" dwarfs all that came before.
In this case it's Mark Gerson, "a networking wizard who has done for professional investors something akin to what Match.com has done for the nation's singles. He hooks up current and former middle managers from hundreds of companies with professional investors desperate for an investing edge." (The Journal reports that Mr G's network includes 180,000 members!)
Needless to say, some employers are duly concerned ... but this is one more genie out of one more bottle that, no matter how intense immediate pushback, is not going to be re-stuffed into said bottle.
Yes, this sort of thing is becoming commonplace. Still, every time I read a story like this, and see yet another barrier to transparency fall, I am both amused and amazed.
Welcome to Web 2.0.
Or Web 3.0.
Or Web 9.83.
What fun it all is!
(NB: Speaking of "transparency," I felt its bite a few days ago. I wrote an email that, I grudgingly admit, contained a "little white lie." Before pushing the send button, I realized that my likely Blog postings would give me away. Fortunately, the hovering finger was withdrawn in time. Yet another "lesson learned, circa 2006.")
Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
What we're talking about
on the front page.
Comments
"lesson learned, circa 2006." ... Tom - I look forward to your '07 plans - '07 as LUCKY number year with "007" spy Brand You savvy needs per this post?
Posted by sean_2.007 at November 28, 2006 11:48 AM
Tom,
Other than being a recruited community of professionals rather than a
random association of amateurs, how does Mark Gerson's work differ
from what is done at The Motley Fool?
John
Posted by ShakespearesFool at November 28, 2006 5:36 PM
‘Genies out of bottles’ - great expression.
How is this for challenging a sacred cow? - Today I heard that toilets, badly in need of upgrading in some hospitals in UK, are being photographed and placed on ‘flicker’ or ‘U-tube.’ I love it – no more excuses or hiding behind ‘no comment’ corporate statements. The pictures tell a story my friends! Transparency??? – You bet and let’s have more of it! The ‘Genie’ is alive and flourishing.
There was a famous UK police drama many years ago called ‘No Hiding Place’ – seems a very appropriate title
Posted by Trevor Gay at November 28, 2006 7:43 PM
"how does Mark Gerson's work differ
from what is done at The Motley Fool?"
He provides tailored services to big investors for big fees based on the product of his network--it's targeted to the high-end professional
Posted by tom peters at November 29, 2006 1:43 AM