Sunday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

President's Day 2007 Post #2: All Men Are Created Equal

Pres W and Pres L, the birthday duo, guided us to a sort of freedom and autonomy that the World had never seen before. Permit me to link that to the 22 January Fortune's annual cover story on "The 100 Best Companies to Work For." (I only read it upon return from NZ.)

The #1 spot went to Google—which is appropriate enough; they are attempting to innovate in organization-people practices as much as in the marketplace. But it was #s 3, 4, & 5 that caught my attention—Big Time. The likes of Google and last year's winner, Genentech, are pretty obvious "types"—at least in retrospect. But retail, which employs huge #s of folks in less than a Goldman Sachs-like pay bracket? Well, #3 was Wegmans (a previous #1), #4 was Container Store, and Whole Foods bagged the #5 slot.

Yes! Retail took 3 of the top 5 slots! Which means to me that "we the people" (not only "cool" Googlers and Genentechers, #2 this year), can find seriously Cool Places to Work in surprising places.

Hooray, say I!

(Also in the top 27: David Weekly Homes at #12—builders are not normally "great places to work"; Nugget Market as #13; Starbucks as #16; and REI, Recreational Equipment Inc., at #27. Thus, 7 of the top 27 in mundane, mass employment retail, are Top Dogs. As I said ... very, very nice.)

Presumably, the lesson here is obvious. No "excluded categories" in the world of Top Employers. (Incidentally, the research methodology behind these rankings is Top Drawer.)

Happy President's Day.

Tom Peters posted this on 02/18/07.

Comments

Tom your point is well made - "Yes! Retail took 3 of the top 5 slots! Which means to me that “we the people” (not only “cool” Googlers and Genentechers, #2 this year), can find seriously Cool Places to Work in surprising places". This has been your point for the past 25 years so you must be "delighted" by these results. Googlers ( by and large) get to choose where they work but other people do not always get a choice. Keep up the good fight Tom it seems you are winning on this one!

Richard

Posted by Richard Lipscombe at February 18, 2007 3:56 PM


1. Happy President's Day - plan to start with a 5 mile run - sure dogs will be talking to me & mocking my cool run shoes & style - so be it - they'll get theirs some day ...

2. Google is such a model for career AND lifestyle - I really see Free Enterprise leading the way & replacing government in quality management of career & citizen services & products

Posted by sean_google at February 18, 2007 6:04 PM


'Which means to me that “we the people” (not only “cool” Googlers and Genentechers, #2 this year), can find seriously Cool Places to Work in surprising places.'

Can I suggest those 'Cool Places to Work' are a response to the demands of frustrated front liners and innovative managers who are fed up with old style controlled/robotic/institutional/boring workplace settings. Just a thought on a wonderful peaceful Sunday evening in England.

Sean - my daily 3 mile run beckons tomorrow (Monday) morning - have you tried dog repellant spray???!! :-)

Posted by Trevor Gay at February 18, 2007 6:51 PM


"...Whole Foods bagged the #5 spot."

Was that paper or plastic?

I believe the rankings show that any company can be a great place to work. No industry should feel like they can't be on that list.

Regards,

Glenn

Posted by Glenn (Customer Service Experience) Ross at February 18, 2007 7:32 PM


Whole Foods does so many things right. Where else does it happen (100% of the time) that if you ask for the location of an item, they will WALK you to it?

Posted by John O'Leary at February 19, 2007 8:26 AM


The surprising thing is that you're surprised. Surveys like this nearly always throw up "surprising" results which really just highlight received wisdom and/or our own assumptions and prejudices. As we in the West move away from being manufacturing economies, wouldn't you expect the retailers and leisure industries to come to the fore?

I also wonder if there's a danger that we're all becoming grumpy old men who moan that the world isn't as good as it used to be and nowhere near as good as it should be. Shouldn't we be celebrating the fact that the message we're so passionate about is getting through? Sure, we can all find incidents like the recent Jet Blue one. But by and large, don't you think that the average employer is a lot more open-minded and employee-friendly than 25 years ago? Does this have any implications for the message we're trying to get across?

Posted by Mark JF at February 19, 2007 8:26 AM


I note that Pfizer is no longer in the Top 100. There are a number of components required for the Top 100, and I bet having a sound business strategy that enables your company and its employees to thrive and to grow is up there. If pride and patent losses go before a fall, then Pfizer is right where it should be now. The company knew 6 years ago that today would come, but it made no attempt to adapt its business model, preferring to cut heads and sell divisions while praying for a hail mary from its labs. Guess Darwin was right about adaptability (not being the smartest or toughest) is the key to survival.

Posted by Marc Rovner at February 19, 2007 9:34 AM


"But by and large, don't you think that the average employer is a lot more open-minded and employee-friendly than 25 years ago?" Mark JF, I do mostly agree with this--but we also see again and again decent, huge surveys that say that perhaps 25% al most of folks say they're "engaged/' in their work--and perhaps another 25% are actively pissed off.

As to myy surprise (delight), try and understand that when I talk about "this stuff", I am routinely challenged with "but we're in retail," or some such.

Posted by tom peters at February 19, 2007 11:20 AM


I've lived near Disneyland and I've lived (still do in fact) near Weggies. Weggies is the happier place.

Full disclosure: I have no financial interest in Wegmans except insofar as they occupy more slots on my monthly statement (by far) than any other of the fine extablishments where I swipe my card(s).

viagra price australia If you live in the northeast, get plowed out and go to Weggies. You'll have a great time...guaranteed.

Posted by Richard Dubin at February 19, 2007 11:21 AM


Whole Foods Market and Nordstroms always get high marks for customer service and as good places to work. Notice their customer base is high income. (The closest WFM to me is three hours away in a ritzy Detroit suburb.) Wal Mart gets killed in these pages and everywhere else for poor service, quality, etc. Wal Mart's core customers are the rest of us.

There's something going on here and I don't like it.

buy viagra in australia with paypal

Posted by red island rhodes at February 19, 2007 3:23 PM


Retail can be a demanding and frustrating business. Customers aren't always nice and many take out their frustrations on the "clerk", feeling that he or she must "take it" or fear job loss. Night and weekend hours interfere with personal life, and as you mentioned, the pay scale isn't likely to impress anyone.

For three retailers to make the top five they must REALLY be doing something right. Good for them.

Posted by Mike at February 19, 2007 5:57 PM


red island rhodes...I think you are on to something. Living in a small town in Michigan myself, WalMart is the only big box choice. (side note...the town I was raised in just got a court ruling to keep Walmart out...but they are only 10 miles from a major city with options) And to be honest, I had to replace a VCR yesterday and just needed a plain one to dub some old tapes. Not wanting to drive 50 miles to the closest big small town, I went to Wally's world. $80 for a combination VCR/DVD Recorder! Not great customer service, nobody to ask any questions of, but damned inexpensive. I am not a raving fan of Walmart, but they do serve a customer base that WFM and Nordstroms really don't want. I think I will try to remember that and be a lot nicer to the Walmart folks next visit.

Posted by Mike Neiss at February 21, 2007 4:22 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

where to buy viagra in canada - July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

viagra real quality - May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

viagra in australia online

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

viagra brand online - September 2002

- March 2002 viagra price comparison

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000 cheapest viagra price

- May 2000

- April 2000

sample viagra for free

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.