Monday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Glam vs. Grey

Hollywood has woken up. Women film purchasers over age 35 are BIG business. Check out the nominee list for best actress. Speaking as a Brit—it looks like for the first time in 10 years (I think?) a mature woman (not a silicon enhanced, self-obsessed tissue eater) will win Best Actress. Hooray!!

This is in stark contrast to the stupidity I saw this week in a business. Eighty percent of the sales force are women under 35. (Selling to a predominantly male population—you figure it out!) NONE of the sales managers were female. ALL of the exec population were OWM. And they are asking me why they have such high turnover. They also got upset when I described it as the least of their problems!

Are you/your organisation truly talent focused ... or is memory substituting for thinking? Has anyone got a great example of a maniacal obsession with talent, to the point of being blind to prejudice, in their organisation that can cheer us all up?!

Chris Nel posted this on 02/23/07.

Comments

Chris, it was beautiful women who won in the last several years, but more disturbing than how thin they are is this: They had to ugly themselves up to win (until Reese Witherspoon last year for Walk the Line). Susan Sarandon, Dead Man Walking; Frances McDormand, Fargo; Hilary Swank, Boys Don't Cry; Julia Roberts, Erin Brokovitch; Halle Berry, Monster's Ball; Nicole Kidman, The Hours; Charlize Theron, Monster; Hilary Swank, Million Dollar Baby. Even, arguably, Gwyneth Paltrow playing a woman dressed as a man in Shakespeare in Love, and Helen Hunt playing a harried mom in As Good As It Gets. As if an actress is only to be taken seriously if she is NOT glamorous.

Posted by cathy mosca at February 23, 2007 11:58 AM


Cathy has a point, but it's ironic: you have to be beautiful and thin to get a studio to even consider you for a role, even if it doesn't require someone who's beautiful and thin. Plus their versions of "ugly" are still light-years beyond how the average woman looks ...

Posted by Paula at February 23, 2007 2:17 PM


Might it be...especially state side...that so many people view the movies as an escape, as a fantasy of what is or can be. Try as they might to create art that imitates life in the story lines, it is still about the unreal. That beauty can be ugly...guess that is the standard for "Oscar Worthy" performance. Even among the older women.

Posted by Bernadette at February 23, 2007 2:30 PM


Wonderful how Chris’s question has turned into a discussion about the merits of thinness, beauty, ugliness or average!

At the risk of being ‘virtually’ beaten with handbags I have to say I have yet to see or meet a VERY thin women I find remotely attractive. Most of these fashion models (and sadly ‘role models’ to young girls) look ill to me. Frankly I would worry sick if my daughter looked like these alleged beautiful thin women - but then what the hell would a middle aged man know about these things :-)

Back to Chris’s question - Has anyone got a great example of a maniacal obsession with talent to the point of being blind to prejudice in their organisation that cheer us all up?

Answer definitely not in my 37 year career so far.

In my experience the only ‘maniacal obsession’ I ever saw in the healthcare world is checking CV’s for the right exam passes. ‘Talent’ doesn’t feature in the recruitment process at all unless we are talking art or sport as far as I can see. I have seen thousands of advertisement for jobs in healthcare and even more job descriptions and I cannot recall one advert or job description where the word talent has actually been seen in print. Sad isn’t it?

Posted by Trevor Gay at February 23, 2007 6:34 PM


1. "Hollywood has woken up." The entertainment culture [EC] & Hollywood never wakes up ... same low-IQ - low-class drivel year after year

2. They "define" EC & make it - then nominate it - then award it - same as House of Lords with similar cool disdain for commoners & front-liners

3. "... being blind to prejudice..." - please Chris - your mini-rant is full of it - trying to balance sex & race %'s - OWM - et al - maybe we'll visit someday on a 15k Zurich run if your knees can make it :>]

Posted by sean_zurich at February 24, 2007 4:34 PM


Sounds like you have been spending time in the Pharma industry. It is an industry-wide issue.

Posted by Jeff at February 25, 2007 2:45 PM


viagra price Most of the time more mature women will be nominated for best actress because their characters have been on this earth longer and they have more layers to their personality and behavior.

Mirren was and still is one of the sexiest British actresses in recent memory. Don't forget she has done it all, raunchy to stodgy..hail to this year's Queen.

Posted by Alex K. at February 26, 2007 11:52 AM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

free viagra samples without prescription - December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

100 mg brand viagra

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

discount online viagra generic

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

buy viagra no prescription australia

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

buy pfizer viagra online with no prescription - January 2006

- December 2005

how to get viagra toronto

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005 purchase viagra online with paypal

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

overnight united states viagra

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.