Thursday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Recommendation

I cannot recommend strongly enough Seymour Hersh's New Yorker article "The General's Report: How Antonio Taguba, who investigated the Abu Ghraib scandal, became one of its casualties." (June 25, 2007)

(This also provides another opportunity to push-as-hard-as-is-humanly-possible Philip Zimbardo's The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil.)

Tom Peters posted this on 06/26/07.

Comments

I read the Taguba article last week and loved it, and so I just bought the book. I'll let you know what I think.

Posted by surya at June 26, 2007 4:29 PM


1. Hilarious TP - trying to make an Abu naked pyramid into "wow" - left liberal lifestyle is what radical Islamists hate & torture only earns their respect if it involves swording a head off.

Posted by sean at June 27, 2007 1:45 PM


I'd like to write more here but the Taguba article has me absolutley reeling. I'm going to check out the Lucifer effect. What truly has been lost here in this country? Soul? Courage? Empathy?

Posted by Chris Bonney at June 27, 2007 4:58 PM


1. Moderate reason via radical social liberal TP & media has been lost Chris - the key story of note lately is "Sir Rushdie" & how "moderate" UK Islamists feel it appropriate that a bomb explode on said courageous Salman and UK supporters of him ... Satanic Verses indeed.

Posted by sean at June 28, 2007 7:56 AM


appreciate the info, i'm getting the book NOW!!! thanks---pk

Posted by PTRADES at June 28, 2007 12:29 PM


Another good read about allegations, leadership and Integrity is Tim Collins' Rules of Engagement which to me spelled out in down to earth terms the complexity of leadship in Iraq

Posted by PaulH at June 29, 2007 11:20 AM


Article is excellent and informative. What are the lessons?

Posted by virk at June 29, 2007 5:07 PM


Wow, sean's out again in force. Point is, if you reckon you've got a better moral and societal code than the other guy you had better hold to it, particularly if you want the other guy to adopt it. If sean hates militant islamists, who are corrupters of a peaceful islamic faith, he should also hate people who corrupt the american ideals of decency. We hold these truths to be self evident, unless you're someone hauled off the street into Abu Ghraib, in which case you're human rights are gone and you can be abused at will. Not good enough by a country mile. America (and all of us) will only win the war on terror by the strength of its (our) ideals. Taguba shows how paper-thin these can be. Respect, Tom.

Posted by Rob at July 1, 2007 1:22 AM


Oops, that should read "your human rights". Early mornings, eh?

Posted by Rob at July 1, 2007 1:32 AM


1. 1000% of what it is though Rob is playing out now in UK - some countries [& you] underestimate & fail to measure & guage Islamfascism perversion - clearly UK is in need of 5,000 more police given their historical ties to Pakistan & large Muslim population. Wolves @ the door & you & TP out chasing Abu rabbits to feel liberal PC.

Posted by sean at July 1, 2007 10:56 AM


I don't think this is about PC at all. MG Taguba had a specific task to investigate according to UCMJ procedures. While somewhat limited in scope, he did everything "by the book." I read the report and it is very much a carefully investigated and documented report. The treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib clearly violated standard SOP.

If the methods at Abu Ghraib did in fact produce valuable intelligence, then it can be debated that the SOP might need to be changed.

But the facts established in his team's report document specific and egregious breaches of military procedure.

Military officers are trained and taught to live by a code of honor. MG Antonio Taguba adhered to that code. He is an inspiring example of leadership, despite the cost to his career.

Posted by Tim Mund at July 2, 2007 8:05 AM


And a happy July 4 to you, sean. I'm currently not in the UK, though my family is, and of course I'm concerned for them. I don't under-estimate as you assume, just have a different idea of how to deal with it. I am working in (secular) Syria, leading a non-governmental project that aims to change the views and attitudes of 5-15-year-olds. If we succeed, young people here will grow up feeling that the future is something positive over which they have a measure of control, and for which they carry some direct responsibility. It's my belief that the best change to any system comes from within, not imposed from outside. And especially not imposed by unthinking force of arms. If that makes me a pathetic liberal in your book so be it. At least I'm practising what I believe in. But then, so probably are you, in apparently trusting to good ol' ordnance to make the world's a better place.

Posted by Rob at July 4, 2007 1:34 PM


Well said Rob - As a UK resident I am proud to join you in the club of 'pathetic liberals.' Mr Gandhi put is simply and powerfully; 'An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.' Good luck with your excellent work Rob.

Posted by Trevor Gay at July 4, 2007 4:07 PM


Thanks Trevor. I can't claim excellence for the work I'm doing, though. It's a slow process of enabling people to see new possibilities, and it may well take a generation to make a difference. However, I think the only way to win a war of ideas is with better ideas, which is why Abu Ghraib was such a disaster.

My quote of the moment. The prophet Mohammed was asked what a person should do if the world were due to end tomorrow. He replied, "Plant a tree".

Posted by Rob at July 5, 2007 12:59 AM


Rob - It is excellent work that you are doing - It is excellent because you are trying to DO SOMETHING practical to make a difference in the world rather than just talking about it.

My quote of the moment - 'What do I think of Western civilization? I think it would be a very good idea.' Mahatma Gandhi

Posted by Trevor Gay at July 5, 2007 3:22 AM


Whether the actions were justified or not, I think maybe the larger issue here is accountability for those actions. The article has a quote from General Randall Schmidt regarding the conduct at Guantanamo that said "Did the means justify the ends? That's fine...(General Miller) was responsible."

We can argue forever whether the actions at Abu Ghraib were justified or not, but the bottom line is (like any well run corporation) we have to be able to trust our highest ranking military officials to make decisions and be willing to stand by those. Clearly right now we can't do that.

Posted by Teddy G at July 5, 2007 11:39 AM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.