Friday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

A Good Mistake: Leave the Wallet Home

I forgot my wallet on a July 3rd grocery trip. (I'm the designated shopper in the family.) When I got to the grocery store—22 miles from home, the closest—I discovered I'd left my wallet behind. Luckily, I had a secret cash stash in the glove compartment, just for this sort of eventuality. Boy, did I ever empty that stash out in my 5 or 6 stops around town!

So what?

So I, doubtless like you, pay for stuff with plastic. There is many an "ouch" in the process. But the credit-card "ouch" is a far cry from peeling off $138 at the grocery store, $37 to fill a ... Subaru, $77 at one of my "ordinary" stops at the book store, and a couple of others. One's sense of the true cost of living goes up by an order of magnitude.

I'm not sure exactly how to translate this into my or your professional life, but I am (very) sure it would be a damn good idea. For those who are solos or in a small professional office or a small retail operation, I'd urge you some month to repeat my adventure in some form or other; after paying the office supply bill in $20s, I'd bet a pretty penny or 10 that the next month would inaugurate an era of tighter purse strings.

In BigCo world, if you've got departments reporting to you, what about invoicing the dept head in the old fashion way (yes, I know the perils of cost allocation—so what) for services rendered—and demanding that he-she pay the bill by writing a check; not quite as powerful as my deal, but perhaps a start.

The bigger point is obvious, if elusive—bringing reality home in some high-impact way. Not that "work as a clerk for a day" crap—which is just a rather fun game—but something somehow realistic.

Many (many) years ago I did a stint in the Pentagon, working on military construction—Navy bases, etc. One day the Admiral in charge called a few of us into his office. We mostly worked on translating the needs of the field into Pentagonese. The sums were, even then, in the billions—and we abbreviated with $2.3B, etc. The Admiral said we were all too careless with taxpayers' money (an extraordinary statement in the Big 5-sided Building), and that, starting immediately, we'd be required to put in all the zeros; hence $2.3B would now be $2,300,000,000. I can't promise you that this little drill in the end benefited the taxpayer; but I can tell you that it did, as the Admiral intended, make us think twice. A trivial story—or not. You be the judge.

Tom Peters posted this on 07/06/07.

Comments

Oprah would agree with you. Her financial "wake-up" plans for highly indebted families include, as a first step, making them LOOK at their spending.

Second step: get rid of the credit cards, often cut up ritualistically with scissors.

Posted by Ramla A. at July 6, 2007 9:07 AM


MBLA: Management by Looking At ("It")

Posted by Ramla A. at July 6, 2007 9:09 AM


Good points, Tom. Over a decade ago ago, I observed a pattern of repeated bouts of overspending in a particular product development organization. The manager seemed to think it just went with the territory of projects and project-oriented spending, but I wasn't sure.

I created a very simple computer model (a "system dynamics" model, if you will) of the way managers decided how to spend money and the way money, goods, and reports flowed through the system.

That simple model recreated the essence of the monthly variance graphs the manager had been tracking. When I modified the model to give the simulated managers different information, the problem went away. When we did that in the real organization, we cut spending variance by 95%, and we made it easy to adjust desired spending levels on the fly.

That project is described in a National Productivity Review article called "Pipeline Inventory: The Missing Factor in Organizational Expense Management." You can find the full reference and another article about the model itself at http://facilitatedsystems.com/pubs.html.

As you might guess from the article's title, what we essentially did was make the ramifications of spending decisions immediately visible to the manager, without the typical delay until items were received and the accounting system reported them. As the NPR article points out in more depth, what we did was the analog of paying with a checkbook rather than a credit card.

Posted by Bill Harris at July 6, 2007 9:41 AM


1. Expense the gas/car & dining & books/cd's as business expenses - I love 5% cash back credit cards & merchant dispute they provide - use for everything - pay in full. PS - TP that is a lot of cash you stash in le car.

Posted by sean at July 6, 2007 9:55 AM


I worked for many years in what was often perceived by too many of us well meaning managers as a ‘bottomless pit’ of money – it was never really ‘our money’. Actually when it came to the crunch we didn’t really give a toss about how much paper we used – how many wasted photocopies we made and so the story goes on. Now I’m a single hander and I know the cost of every inkjet cartridge I use and I don’t print unless I must. I now look for the cheapest way to make business phone calls. If I can afford to go to conferences I will take home the writing pads and pencils and pens to save buying them – is that stealing I ask myself? – not really says me :-). These are but small examples.

You are right about the "work as a clerk for a day crap”

I come across quotes like ‘Walk a mile in my shoes” as if by doing that one might understand. It helps a bit but actually to walk in someone else’s shoes still means they are not your shoes.

I recently destroyed three plastic cards because the temptation is to ‘buy today pay tomorrow’ – it’s a human trait when tempted … and tomorrow sometimes never comes.

The only way to live within our means is to live within our means. Carrying cash is a great discipline - I love using cash. When the coins are gone you have no money - something rather simple but refreshing about that concept – but I fear it will never catch on …… :-)

Posted by Trevor Gay at July 6, 2007 10:31 AM


Having worked many stints as a waiter early in my career, I can say that this practice should also be used occasionally to pay individuals for their work. Most of us work on long-term projects where the pay comes either sporadically (i.e. when the vendors finally deliver) or electronically on a regular basis that never correlates to the pace of the work.

Imagine if you were paid by your boss or client on a daily basis for what you actually produced. The payee would mete out the green directly to you based on what you actually produced that day. When this happens as a waiter, for example, you leave the workplace with a great feeling of satisfaction and relief--you've worked hard, the job is done, and you have the pay right there for what you just did. Think about what that would be like in your current gig, or gigs.

Posted by Tom Ehrenfeld at July 6, 2007 12:07 PM


Having worked both "agency" and "corporate," I'm a big fan of corporations actually adopting the practice of hourly "billing" -- tracking every hour you spend on a project. This helps evaluate why time estimates are so "off," and helps identify when things get out of scope.

While we sit in our comfy "corporate land" and gleefully enjoy our time-sheet-less days, managers above us wonder "why things take so long." If we could document that every text change on our web site requires 15 minutes from each of six people, maybe we'll all start understanding why a content management system must become a priority.

Posted by Christy at July 6, 2007 1:31 PM


Paying cash is an excellent practice if you want to really see how fast your money goes. But I fear that the day will come when we're not allowed to pay cash. It'll cost too much to handle. Or the store will charge a cash-penalty because they're not getting your personal information for their data base.Cash payers will be viewed with distrust. (What are we hiding?) I think of this everytime the twenty-something in line in front of me at Dunkin' Donuts uses plastic to buy a cup of coffee.

Posted by Maureen Rogers at July 6, 2007 10:50 PM


It's not just the tangible cash that worries me it's the time cost. When you have 5 managers in a room for goodness knows how long discussing the purchasing of 1 PC. I believe that tangible costs actually get quite enough checks (cheques?!) and balances - it's the intangible that worries me...

Posted by PaulH at July 7, 2007 10:59 AM


For lower wage people, think in terms of hours worked. I'm retired and have a part-time, low-wage job. When I look at something and realize that it's two days work, I think twice about it.

Posted by Tom E. Snyder at July 7, 2007 1:28 PM


Today, we as consumers are being conditioned to think of our spending as patriotic. It’s our part in the great Global Free Market Capitalist system. As a sole proprietor I have become painfully aware of the great manipulation of the masses to use plastic where the banking system sucks up 5% to 23% on every transaction from the fees charged to the retailer to the poor brainwashed individual who has lost the ability to beware of the seller. I call it the Great Corporate Vacuum effect. It is no wonder the middle class is shrinking, bankruptcies are escalating and the retirement age is rising.

“Or the store will charge a cash-penalty because they're not getting your personal information for their data base.”

To respond to Maureen, Being in the creative end of the marketing field, I see from the inside how the gathering of information and the covert data mining of individuals has been elevated to the level of all out surveillance. It pales in comparison to KGB days of the Soviet Union. All that information is POWER being used to turbo charge the suction of Great Corporate Vacuum and separate us from more and more of our money without giving anything in return and doing nothing to better our society.

There needs to be pyridine shift away from corporate profiteering to corporate ethics and social responsibility. In the super speed race to globalization someone needs to step back and ask what kind of society are we building, and will we want to live in that world?

Posted by MLM at July 7, 2007 6:33 PM


viagra online uk no prescription

As an exercise in reminding yourself of the value of money, this is an OK idea. It's simply a shame that people forget it. Personally, I think there's a deeper problem with credit cards and it's got more to do with people not appreciating that the credit has to be paid back and quite possibly with interest; over-extending their borrowing; and some people seeing no wrong in defaulting on their obligations. We can all rant at the lenders for making it too easy - although we'd rant at the civil liberties implications if they insisted on doing the credit checks that would help address the problem! And ultimately, it's about individuals taking responsibility for their own behaviour - a lesson we seem poor at teaching our youngsters.

BTW, I get really annoyed at this blind assumption that BigCo = no sense of the value of things. Sure, we can all rattle off examples of waste (and maybe we'd even find some in SmallCo, too?) but I'm sure there are plenty of people like the Admiral doing their best to ensure they and their people behave responsibly.

Personally, I hate cash and shall carry on spending my money on a credit card (it's a fabulous convenience + there's a loyalty programme) when I know I can afford it and can pay it off at the end of the month. And I shall always try to treat the money of the BigCo I work for as though it were my own business.

Posted by Mark JF at July 9, 2007 2:41 AM


Paying in cash definitely has its payoffs. When you're out shopping with kids, sometimes it's a good idea to pay in cash, especially if you're buying something for them. This makes them attach a value to their possession. Sure, this may not have anything to do with busines, but your kid one day might change the business world, who knows!

Posted by Subir Ghosh at July 9, 2007 3:28 AM


Similar concept was explored in a recent NY Times article detailing a study that showed tolls rise faster once EZPass is introduced: outta sight, outta mind.

Posted by Jeffrey Cufaude at July 9, 2007 7:52 AM


I wonder, too, how much internet selling actually benefits from this cashless phenomenon? It's very easy to click a few "Buy now!" buttons and it's so convenient and all of a sudden you've spent much more money than you might ever have intended.

And another problem here: what about people who shop on the internet in the evening after they've had a glass or two of sherry?!

Posted by Mark JF at July 9, 2007 10:36 AM


BTW: that's some stash you keep in the car!

Posted by Mark JF at July 9, 2007 3:07 PM


Tom Peters,

Keep paying cash and you may become a fan of Dave Ramsey.

http://www.daveramsey.com/etc/cms/index.cfm?intContentID=3478

= http://tinyurl.com/27jrhz

canadian generic viagra healthcare

John

Posted by ShakespearesFool at July 9, 2007 3:13 PM


Tom,

Do you really think it was a good idea telling a million people that you keep cash in your car?

You're such a trusting soul, you wouldn't last 10 minutes on Youtube :)

Posted by John Gregor at July 11, 2007 12:12 AM


generic viagra free shipping
purchase viagra online without prescription

ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

buy cheap viagra online from india - August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

viagra online price

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

generic viagra discount - November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

cheapest viagra price

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001 paypal viagra in canada

how to get viagra toronto

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.