Thursday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Who Woulda Thunk I:
For Shame On Waterman and Peters!

Bob and Tom are idiots! Neither of them, in 1982 in In Search of Excellence, predicted that in October 2007 there would be a Vanity Fair ad for Louis Vuitton featuring Mikhail Gorbachev sitting in the back of a limo with his Vuitton bag at his side.

Tom Peters posted this on 10/05/07.

Comments

I must disagree. You are certainly not idiots - geniuses is more like it! In 1982 no one could not have "predicted" the coming collapse of the Soviet Union. It was after all the height of the cold war and communist movements were prevalent across the globe. According to them, they had "capitalism on the run" and the west was decadent and weak.

Amazing what 25 years and the lure of private enterprise can do for the leader of a fallen totalitarian state. As a good capitalist I am both unsurprised that Gorbachev has taken this route and delighted to see his unapologetic embrace of it.

Posted by Andrew Hayden at October 5, 2007 10:18 AM


Free enterprise, freedoms & wealth creation brought down the Soviets & Gorbie knows luxury like an oil sheik :>]

And now Russia is creating wealth like they invented it - albeit saber rattle time with Europe & delight in "coalitions" Iran/Iraq quagmire :>[

Peters & Waterman with Condie to kick start a new middle east free enterprise & wealth initiative & how about PM Brown as perfect new high finance USA hand puppet :>]

Posted by John at October 5, 2007 11:54 AM


I am ALWAYS an optimist and it is truly magnificent what has happened in the USSR. I am really sorry to be a party pooper but before we get too excited about 'progress' can I say that 25 years ago we wouldn’t have predicted that in 2007 - 20,000 people - mainly children - would die every day on our ONE planet - simply due to extreme poverty. In my occasional melancholy moments I think about whether my great, great, grandchildren will look back on 2007 and our supposedly advanced civilisation with the same horror as we look back to 1807 when slavery was ‘acceptable’ and the world ‘stood by’ until the great William Wilberforce finally achieved the abolition of the slave trade. It is at best ironic in our supposedly advanced world that we can stand by and allow 20,000 people to die every day for reasons that can be avoided. As Bono says this is not a charity issue it is a justice issue.

Posted by Trevor Gay at October 5, 2007 4:04 PM


After reading NNT's "Black Swan", I have somehow lost interest in the word ‘predict’…I think, our epistemological arrogance makes us feel ‘we know everything and want to predict everything’ and therefore is the root cause of trying to predict even the unknown unknowns a.k.a. uncertainty. So, I don’t think it’s a big deal if TP & BW didn’t predict Oct’07 LV Ad featuring Gorbachev (which, I believe truly is an ‘uncertain’ event, not necessarily 'unfortunate' for LV). After all it has taken over 150 years for LV to clean their radar screens and suddenly discover emerging super powers like China, India, Russia (to feature Gorbachev in their ad) to help grow their kitty. I feel we are not far away from seeing all heads of state (both alive & dead) carrying a LV Bag / accessories in the days to come. That's what I call "French freakonomics" or "Dead Man Walking"!

Posted by K.Sriram at October 6, 2007 12:51 AM


"Black Swan" is a mixed bag. USA's hand-puppet PM Brown says NO elections - conservatives are strong & he shrinks in fear = who could have Predicted that?! :>]

Posted by John at October 8, 2007 6:40 AM


Tom - you also failed to predict that Elton John would be happily married, an English soccer player would be one of the US's top earners and Apple would have re-invented itself as the pre-eminent "computer" company of the digital age. Wow! I for one plan to enjoy watching and contributing to the next 25 years.

Posted by Mark JF at October 9, 2007 3:25 AM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.