Saturday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

Cheapest Viagra Price

Women to Save Pier 1?

I was perusing my online newsletter from Workforce.com when I came across a couple of interesting articles. One about a 4-year study of Fortune 500 companies providing evidence that "Firms with More Women on Boards Perform Better Than Those That Don't." "We have established a correlation between diverse boards and strong corporate performance," says Kara Helander, vice president, Western Region at New York-based Catalyst.

I, then, read an article about Pier 1 Imports' financial woes and their plan to correct their downturn by cutting healthcare costs. The plan includes cutting employees' hours to disqualify them for health benefits (very Wal*Mart-like). Pier 1 CEO Alex Smith is calling it a "cost-efficiency mission." Sounds to me like a nice way to say, "Hey employees, we're screwing you, but keep up the good work because you're improving our bottom line." According to the article, "Pier 1 Imports soon will learn whether cutting health care benefits for the very employees who deliver what the company calls its signature in-store shopping experience will help resurrect the failing retailer or exacerbate its multimillion-dollar losses."

I could go on and on discussing why I think this is a tragic solution to their problem, but given that I just read the Catalyst study, my first thought was, "Huh? I wonder if there is a correlation between their performance and the number of women they have on their Board?" So, I googled Pier 1. Imagine that ... the Board of Directors is made up entirely of men! I'm completely flabbergasted! Pier 1?! All Men?! What are they thinking??? They might do well to heed this statement from the study: "It makes sense that companies with more women on their boards would perform better than those that don't because these companies probably have a better handle on their customer base," says Dale Winston, CEO of Battalia Winston, a New York-based executive search firm.

Recall this passage from Tom's Re-imagine! "All you have to do is look! LOOK AT A DAMN PICTURE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ... hopelessly unrepresentative of the market being served ... I am not championing "quotas" ... I am championing a board whose composition mirrors the market (diversity) and technologies (youth) that represent our biggest challenges." Do you think Pier 1's customer base is made up entirely of men? Given that I shop there, I can say with 100% confidence the answer is NO!!! Perhaps I'll send some enlightened inspiration to Mr. Alex Smith (a copy of Tom's book perhaps?) so instead of disenfranchising his staff, he can re-imagine a strategy to revitalize Pier 1. I'd love a happy ending ...

Darci Riesenhuber posted this on 10/17/07.

Comments

This poses an interesting question of which is the cause and which the effect. Do successful companies value diversity and thus seek to have diverse boards, or do diverse boards cause companies to become successful? My guess (guess only) would be that boards are rarely engaged enough in day to day operations to affect company performance in a meaningful way. That is achieved by management. ("In the years that I've spent on various boards I've never heard a single suggestion from a director (made as a director at a board meeting) that produced any result at all." Robert Townsend (Avis)). Thus a successful company that has embraced the value of diversity reflects that all the way up to the membership of the board.

Posted by Bruce at October 18, 2007 8:22 AM


As a follow-up, Pier 1 has two women on its board: Cece Smith and Karen Katz (Nieman Marcus). The real issue would appear to be senior management: only one woman, Sharon M. Leite - Executive Vice President, Store Operations.

Posted by Bruce at October 18, 2007 8:34 AM


The "old boys" network is still in existence in the realm of the boardroom to a great extent. Leadership on the board will affect change in the company culture and diversity of the executive management team. As every market is transformed, and they all will be, the boards containing those with myopic vision will be wrenched into letting their customers tell them how to be successful instead of vice versa.

Posted by Bryan at October 18, 2007 8:44 AM


Are these people INSANE?

Instead of going down to the floor and asking the people who actually talk to the customers for their input, they're cutting their hours to take away their health benefits?

The very people they need to help turn things around will be worrying about their families and out looking for another job, instead of focusing on the customer's delight.

I ask again- are these people insane?

Posted by Lois Gory at October 18, 2007 9:32 AM


I was just reading this to my wife (who used to enjoy Pier 1 in the late 80's to mid 90's) and she said, "Why don't they update their look and product? They're stuck in the 80's! Cutting or increasing their healthcare costs aren't going to help...get some new inventory and an updated look!"
Generally, women shop(ped) at Pier One, not men. The whole company obviously needs a shake-up. In any event, this particular cost cutting is only going to hurt them. And yes, they're INSANE.

Posted by todd at October 18, 2007 11:05 AM


Thanks, Bruce, for the correction on the Board members. Perhaps new to the team? (given that they weren't listed on the '06 annual report). And, I did notice they have 1 female member on the Executive Team responsible for Store Performance, which seemed like a good thing (I wonder how long she's been on the team).

Perhaps this is old news too, but in their annual report (I believe) there was no mention of Target in their comp. set. I would say that is a major oversight, as well. Perhaps they didn't see that threat coming and were too slow to respond.

I read another article yesterday that indicates that they get feedback from customers and, perhaps as a result, are re-evaluating their product mix. However, I am still curious, to your point Lois, if they engage their workforce at all in these conversations.

To reflect back on your comments, Bruce. Perhaps it is not diversity of the board that matters, but diversity of management (and not so much in sex, race, color, or creed, but of thought). And, I would say if they are using their "whole brain", they know to seek the input of their workforce who is in direct contact with the consumer every day and has a direct impact on the customer experience (hope their disgruntled employees aren't too hard on their customers during all of this...I think Pier 1 might need them right now).

Posted by Darci at October 19, 2007 9:12 AM


The SEC website stores the filings from public companies. From those filings: Karen Katz has been a director since June 2001, Sece Smith became a director in June 2007 and Sharon Leite joined the Company in August 2007.

Posted by Peter at October 19, 2007 7:58 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010 sample viagra prescription

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010 best quality viagra online

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009 viagra australia paypal

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

buy viagra online 25mg

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007 where to order viagra

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

generic viagra discount

- August 2004 cheapest prices on viagra

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

viagra price

- February 2002

how to get viagra canada - January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

how to buy real viagra online

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.