Saturday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Mother Lode!

The Atlantic this month (12.07) is loaded with my favorite sort of analyses; namely, those that reveal counter-intuitive truths (or decent speculations, at any rate). Consider:

*SLUMS ARE GOOD. Today's burgeoning slums are the product of people pouring into the cities from the countryside—in pursuit of jobs. (In 2008, cities' population will surpass countryside population.) While eyesores and cause of appropriate concern, said cities are in fact the source of jobs, and overall poverty reduction is significantly attributable to the migration—burgeoning slums notwithstanding. The assertion is that no nation has grown wealthy since the start of the Industrial Revolution until the country-city migration was in full flower. ("Bright Lights, Big Cities," Matthew Quirk)

*HOME OWNERSHIP IS BAD. There are indeed enormous benefits to home ownership. But the big drawback, especially in times of economic revolution, is that home ownership measurably slows migration from where the jobs were to where the jobs are. ("Housebound," Clive Crook)

*WE HAVE TOO MANY DOCTORS. The supply of doctors to an area is significantly determined by the wealth and insurance coverage of the population. Hence there are more docs per capita in well-off areas—where, in fact, medical problems are less intense per capita. This also leads in particular to an excess of specialists—lots of docs prescribe lots of tests and make lots of referrals. As to the "bottom line," healthcare, per several sound measures, is no better in places with lotsa per capita docs than in places that are doc-deprived. It gets more interesting: The more specialists, the worse the outcomes. (More or less.) Specialists trip over one another, give conflicting advice, and are notoriously bad at cross-communication. More on specialists: The glamour and pay accorded to specialists comes at the price of less and less well-paid primary care docs—it is the vanishing primary care docs who are primarily responsible for good healthcare outcomes. Dr Elliott Fisher, Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences at Dartmouth Medical School: "If we sent 30 percent of the doctors in this country to Africa, we might raise the level of health on both continents." ("Overdose," Shannon Brownlee)

*Less AID, more aid. "Scents & Sensibility," by Sarah Chayes, is the saga of helping Afghans successfully build a soap and body-oil business. It's also the umpteenth repeat of the story of how such "on the ground," practical, human-scale efforts are slowed or halted by the ham-handedness of USAID. [Web-only slideshow]

*THE LATE-BIRD STARTS THE CREATIVE ENTERPRISE. From "How You Sleep Is Who You Are" [not available online]: "Early risers prefer to gather knowledge from concrete information. They reach conclusions through logic and analysis. Night-owls are more imaginative and open to unconventional ideas, preferring the unknown and favoring intuitive leaps on their way to reaching conclusions." Morning people are more self-controlled, more formal, respect authority, and obsess on making a good impression. The late bunch are more independent and have less respect for authority. (Research source cited by the Atlantic: "Morning and Evening Types: Exploring Their Personality Styles," by Juan Francisco Diaz-Morales.) (TP note: Sounds like we need a night-owl CEO matched by an early-bird CFO.)

Tom Peters posted this on 11/29/07.

Comments

Regarding – we need fewer doctors.

I worked with a family doctor here in the UK who had spent a few years working in Africa. Richard tells me him and one other doctor (his senior - an African trained doctor) were the only two doctors in a hospital covering a population of 500,000 people. They dealt with everything that ‘came through the door.’

Richard said it was the greatest learning of his medical career to date. When he hears doctors bemoaning staffing levels he usually smiles wryly. By the way this is not some old man looking back with rose tinted glasses. Richard is in his early 40’s.

I am certainly not advocating reducing the number of doctors but I am agreeing with the proposition that recruiting more doctors is not always the most effective way of dealing with increasing healthcare demand.

Posted by Trevor Gay at November 29, 2007 5:34 PM


More on docs...and healthcare in general.

Perverse incentives have led to an overabundance of specialists...and the studies demonstrating an inverse correlation between the number of specialists per capita and both morbidity and mortality are absolutely true from a public health perspective.

(Besides the "too many chefs in the kitchen" effect, there's a stronger effect: "If your only tool is a hammer, then everything begins to look like a nail." The number of unnecessary imaging tests, unnecessary stents, back surgeries, and other interventions so often begins a cascade of events that leads to harm! Beware!)

Primary care, wellness, and keeping patients away from hospitals and interventions is essential.

Our current system devalues these services. Faced with significant debt, many medical students pursue the more highly reimbursed (and interventional) specialties.

If you like data, take a look at this updated report from the Commonwealth Fund:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/newsroom/newsroom_show.htm?doc_id=482616

Despite spending twice as much per capita than other OECD countries, the US ranks last or next to last on all indicators of health system performance.

Regarding the number of doctors, we need LESS specialists and MORE primary care physicians with appropriate geographic distribution for the population.

Among other things, this must ultimately involve reducing reimbursement for some entities to provide greater incentives for primary care physicians.

By the way, the dysfunctional market conditions we create for healthcare are a large part of the problem. Universal coverage is essential, and so is competition. Healthy competition can only occur if the consumer knows the value proposition...how much "bang for the buck?"

Manoj

Posted by Manoj Pawar at December 2, 2007 5:02 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009 viagra at discount prices

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

best online viagra store

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

overnight viagra delivery without prescription

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002 viagra 100mg pfizer

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000 real cheap viagra

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

viagra brand buy

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

viagra uk prescription

What we're talking about
on the front page. purchase generic viagra on line without a prescription