Saturday Edition

The model for future success from Tom Peters Company


Get the Blog Feed
What is RSS?

dispatches from the new world of work

Don't Know Where You're Going? So What?

Get Going Anyway! Now!

When you decide to move, no matter where, no matter how wise, you more or less (mostly "more") force "the other guy" (army, opposing team, business competitor) to react. And those who watch or participate in, say, football know—running backwards and reacting is as tough an act as there is.

General U.S. Grant was the master of this. "Keep moving, somewhere, anywhere, but keep moving" was his de facto-de jure "strategy." As long as he was on the move the other general was in a constant reactionary mode of operations. ("What the hell is Grant up to now?") This strategy applied with legendary relentlessness led Grant to victory after victory—and won the Civil War for the Yankees. (Since there's no such thing as a free lunch, it's worth noting that one of Grant's few weaknesses was building defensive fortifications.)

I thought about all this while examining the results of this year's Gator Bowl. Texas Tech's Red Raiders are in the second tier when it comes to the likes of recruiting might, yet once again they had a great season, ending with a Gator Bowl win against the favored and nationally ranked Virginia Cavaliers.

Texas Tech is football's #1 proponent of "just keep moving"—and let the other guy react. Their basic offensive "strategy" is "everybody who legally can run like hell down the field and we'll throw the ball toward one of you." Against UVA the result was an unexpected 31-28 victory.

Virginia's quarterback, Jameel Sewell, passed 28 times, and garnered 17 completions—an average set of numbers per normal offensive practice. (For the year, Mr Sewell completed 162 of 270 passes—again, about normal.) On the other side of the line at the Gator Bowl, Red Raiders quarterback Graham Harrell threw the ball an astounding 69 times—and picked up 44 completions; for the year, which included one 75-7 victory, Mr Harrell had 512 completions from 713 attempts. (Those who are not fans of American football will have to take my word for it that statistics like this, to the normal follower of the sport, are truly "dumbfounding"—at the least.)

Air Force Colonel John Boyd re-wrote the modern military strategy book with an idea called "O.O.D.A. Loops." O.O.D.A. stands for: Observe. Orient. Decide. Act. Whoever has the shortest OODA cycle tends to win—mostly by confusing the enemy, who is forced into a permanently reactionary mode of action. In aerial warfare, the opponents of those with the quickest OODA loop-cycle tend to die not shot down, but by crashing courtesy disorientation caused by overreacting to the lightening fast twists and turns of the "keep on moving" pilot.

We have, I am aware, but a small number of fighter pilots in our Blogging community at tompeters.com—and a large # of you who couldn't care less about this year's Gator Bowl, hard as that is for me to fathom. For you, as well as those of us blessed with a love of the smell of pigskin, my bottom line is quite simple: Instead of spending the first weeks of the New Year reviewing plans for the days ahead, hustle the hell out onto the field and visit a passel of customers, give the green light to a slew of half-baked prototype tests, say "yes" to damn near any proposal that crosses your desk. (Why not, in fact, a green light, permanently lit, on your office door or desk?) Message: Just start chuggin'! We want the "other guys" to be immediately forced to run backwards—and as the title of the Post says, don't worry much about what you're doing, just get doing. (E.g., Have you made those 50 calls I ordered on New Year's Eve? I'll generously give you a week of grace—but I will not tolerate your attendance at a bunch of planning meetings. Period.)

Tom Peters posted this on 01/04/08.

Comments

Great stuff, Tom. Two quick things:

1. I call what you're advocating the "Havlicek Principle" after John Havlicek, the Celtics Hall of Famer. He was out on the court ALL the time (still among the top all-time in minutes played) and he KEPT MOVING, on offense and defense, ALL THE TIME. This meant he was effective even against bigger or faster opponents -- he harried and worried them to death on both ends of the court.

2. If you haven't already, do yourself a favor and read Michael Lewis's NYT profile of Texas Tech coach Mike Leach: http://tinyurl.com/yops5g

(Crazy great-minds-think-alike note: when I blogged about that article 24 months ago . . . I put it in the context of OODA! Here's THAT link, in case you're really curious: http://tewalkerjr.com/blog/?p=151 )

Posted by Tim Walker at January 4, 2008 2:44 PM


smile...some things are predictable. (like the Lions firing more coaches and granting yet another reprieve to the losingest general manager in NFL history). For all these years of association with tp and his company, I can always count on a burst of energy around January 1st. I would say it is something in the vermont water, but it precedes that. thanks for another call to action...happy new year...mtn

Posted by Mike Neiss at January 4, 2008 5:10 PM


If there is a "secret" to success, I'd say this is it-- especially in the internet age.

I'm sure you are correct about the effect of constant action on the competition, but there is an equally powerful effect on the company/individual who follows this approach.

By constantly acting, reassessing, then acting again... in the fastest possible cycles... the individual-company creates an intensely fast learning curve. Better than forcing the competition to react, you force yourself to get better, smarter, and more interesting-- fast!

I'm somewhat embarrassed to say that this was virtually my one and only strategy to "success". I started my micro-company a year ago-- absolutely clueless. Being clueless, my mantra became "try as much stuff as possible, as fast as possible... and gather as much feedback as possible. Then repeat as often as possible."

Not exactly profound business thinking-- but damn effective nonetheless.

Posted by AJ Hoge at January 4, 2008 10:54 PM


Tim, love the "Havlicek principle"! I did read Lewis' great piece on Leach, and I think I blogged it too.

(I also think I'll resurrect a term I concocted a few years ago and dropped; namely "metabolic management." My meaning was that the boss is responsible, especially in the "walk the talk" sense, for setting and managing and instilling the tempo of the enterprise--which I see as a deep cultural-genetic trait. My idea was to make this great notion of tempo an explicit part of the bosses' job. One thing neither of us probably does enough re this topic is to make it clear that OODA-tempo is very different from raw speed. The constant battle between wide receivers and safetys in football is one of the most illustrative cases.)

Most important, love your blog--have asked Cathy Guru to link it to ours.

Posted by tom peters at January 5, 2008 8:19 AM


AJ Hoge: "Embarrassed," are you nuts? It is in my (old!!) book too about the only thing one needs to know for sure--and I'm not in the least bit embarrassed by that. (To learn one thing "for sure" in 65 years is no small thing.) And the great news is that it is a "sustainable" competitive advantage because most never figure out that this is really all one needs to know!!!

Cheers and happy 2008 OODA-ing your way to success! tom

Posted by tom peters at January 5, 2008 8:26 AM


Great comment AJ - hope you are well by the way :-)

In the corporate world I used to work in an environment where strategic planning was considered the Holy Grail. After more than three years now of independence and self employment I realise what total crap that is.

My business planning is one month ahead and if I am doing well a three month plan. You are so right AJ – it is all about trying loads of things and some will come off. I make hundreds of contacts - ‘tries’ - every month and a very small proportion materialise into work. Some ‘tries’ never go beyond initial contact and seem to be dead. Then out of the blue ‘tries’ I made months before re-emerge and something will happen. Then someone will take me on having had no previous contact with me. Then a client who used me regularly will not use me for a while. There is just no logic – it is a crazy unpredictable world in business and I love it. Strategic Planning? – Bah humbug!! – No such thing.

All I have in my own business 'strategic planning' (Ha Ha) is a whole lot of ‘tries’ and if I gave up on the ‘tries’ I guess I would ‘retire’ back to the boring corporate existence – But that will not happen until Hell Freezes Over to quote The Eagles :-)

There are ALWAYS new opportunities to 'try' and from those 'tries' will emerge a freshness and new directions for me to travel.

Keep on trying.

Posted by Trevor Gay at January 5, 2008 8:44 AM


Thanks for the kind words about the blog, Tom. I like what you say about tempo versus speed. Your wideout / safety analogy is apt; I also think of Larry Bird, who had fast hands but little else in the way of speed -- yet constantly demonstrated superior tempo.

Re metabolism in managers: given the basics of treating people decently, knowing how to read a spreadsheet, etc., the great separator I've noticed between effective and ineffective managers is that the good ones get comfortable with taking action quickly, i.e. understanding that negative feedback doesn't equate to some big, bad "failure". The bad ones don't develop that level of comfort, so they're always pondering decisions that should have been made last month.

Posted by Tim Walker at January 5, 2008 10:37 AM


"...give the green light to a slew of half-baked prototype tests, say "yes" to damn near any proposal that crosses your desk."

When I was the CMO of a software engineering firm during the dot com era, my boss would find a way to work, "If it's a good idea, it's worth doing poorly," into conversation at least once a day. When I got over the annoyance of it, I realized he was on to something.

We don't drive innovation through planning. It only comes in the doing.

Thanks for the gentle reminder in this new year.

Posted by DaveH at January 5, 2008 12:24 PM


"If it's a good idea, it's worth doing poorly,"

Dave, you could take it a step further: If it's a good idea, it WILL be done poorly. If it's novel enough to be interesting, then the first 5 (10, 20?) tests will be messy-equivocal as hell: if it works right the first (2nd, 3rd) time then it was not, by definition, an interesting idea. Agree?

viagra cheap overnight

happy 08!

Posted by tom peters at January 5, 2008 1:16 PM


"We don't drive innovation through planning. It only comes in the doing."

Hope this one's on a plaque over your desk!!!!!!!

Posted by tom peters at January 5, 2008 1:18 PM


Once I struck out on my own, I found it very easy to make decisions and take action. Without some bozo ("manager") lurking over me, I became amazingly decisive and action-oriented.

But recently I've discovered a new challenge-- I've got a couple of people in my company now and suddenly I'm the bozo! For the first couple of months, my partners were indecisive and clearly worried about making mistakes. We make English lessons for non-native speakers-- and my partners were making painfully slow progress on new lessons.

I constantly said, "Don't worry! Just try stuff! I don't care if you screw up!"... but this had little effect.

After fretting and sweating about this for months, I finally decided that the very idea of a "manager" was the problem.

So we're trying something new. Each teacher will own the lesson sets they create. In fact, they will own their own little business. They will create their own lesson sets, their own web pages, and their own marketing campaign for that set of lessons. I provide mentoring, training, referrals, and funding when appropriate.

To encourage a unified brand, we all agree to certain values, principles, and methods. Each individual is tied to every other through a web of referral incentives, commissions, training, communication, values, and personal contact.

All of which is a complicated way of saying that we've totally removed the concept of "boss"-- and lo and behold, everyone is suddenly a super-charged decision maker!

The best way to implement an action-biased OODA culture is to get rid of the bozos. And if you are the bozo-- find a way to get rid of yourself (or at least your bozo role).

Posted by AJ Hoge at January 5, 2008 4:58 PM


I believe, people who made it BIG (in their chosen field) didn’t have a clue about what they were doing BUT they knew how they were going to be if they did things that mattered most & were passionate about. As Karl Wallenda put it “Being on the tightrope is living; everything else is waiting.”

Posted by Sriram at January 7, 2008 2:26 AM


Tom,
This is one of my great pet peeves in the corporate world. Having spent most of my career there (including my current parallel lives in both the small design firm business as well as working for "the man") I have always been baffled by the number of "successful" executives who will take no action until something has been studied, analyzed and researched to the point of commoditization before allowing anyone to take any action or do any real, productive work.

About ten years ago I was working for one of the largest companies in the world and was frustrated by the layer upon layer of bureaucracy that essentially kept anything from moving faster than at a glacial pace (this is the place where the CEO once said that new products were not launched, they escaped). I got so frustrated that I started doing anything I could to try and get things through the system even little things were victories. Funny thing was, that it seemed to work and after a couple of months I had a colleague look me straight in the eye and say "How come it seems like you're the only one around here who ever gets anything done?" I simply told her that I got tired of waiting for others to make decisions.

Posted by Andrew Hayden at January 7, 2008 1:19 PM


Tom,

I do agree it WILL be done poorly (probably more so if it's planned.)

There are a few of us who thrive the messiness of innovation. I would rather plow through and a year from now say, "look what we accomplished." Even if it takes multiple bites at the apple. That's a much more exciting way to work.

I'm heading out to make plaques for resale now. ;)

Posted by DaveH at January 8, 2008 11:21 PM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

viagra overnight online

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

pfizer viagra 100mg canada - July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

buy brand viagra in canada

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002 viagra canadian

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

viagra free sample online

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

online canadian pharmacy generic viagra - December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000 canadian pharmacies viagra

viagra from canada

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.