Thursday Edition

dispatches from the new world of work

Trust Assessment

We got an email from a friend of a friend. Charles Green, coauthor with Cool Friend David Maister of The Trusted Advisor, wrote to us to ask if we could put this before our audience: Your Trust Quotient. Go to this link to take the assessment. I like it, though others at tp.com have reservations. Everybody says the same thing: It is very subjective. But, I found that its results described me fairly accurately. So, I'm putting it out to you. Try it out. Leave some comments for Charles. If you are not sold on his online integrity assessment, tell him how to make it better. Also, let him know, did it get you right as I found it did me? And, most importantly, do you see any uses for it in your work?

Cathy Mosca posted this on 05/29/08.

Comments

'Everybody says the same thing: It is very subjective.'

ABSOLUTELY – that sounds a lot like life as far as I’m concerned :-) I liked it and felt my result was fair about me - I tried to be honest. Thanks for the tip off Cathy and thank you Charles.

Posted by Trevor Gay at May 29, 2008 6:13 PM


A relevant instrument. In my experience, people with high self-orientation have significantly less self-awareness which makes coaching them difficult in many cases. In its worst form, the individual becomes un-coachable with looking good taking priority over getting better. We use the trust equation in our high-performance work teams and I have seen it significantly improve team-based outcomes when used to improve understanding during conflict.

Posted by David Porter at May 29, 2008 6:15 PM


I too took the assessment and saw value in most of the feedback. Subjectivity...who cares? It gave me stuff to think about and perhaps take action on. I'm thinking that's the point.

Passion, People, Principles. I read the interview with David Maister and went to the website. I really like the Big Three...The Trifecta for Success. Will have to read more.

Great stuff here folks...thanks for the tips and the tools!

Posted by Dave Wheeler at May 29, 2008 11:17 PM


I came up with low (4.3) trustworthiness score so should you believe anything I say about the test?

Posted by Mark JF at May 30, 2008 4:03 AM


Mark, you've just convinced me that you are supremely truthful, because, when I took the test, I couldn't imagine anyone giving themselves low marks on any of the questions. So, to score on the low end, you either gave yourself some hard judgments, or you're proud of things I wouldn't dream of doing!

Thank you all for good comments on this. I'm sure Charles will appreciate them.

Posted by cathy mosca at May 30, 2008 9:21 AM


I'd be curious of Tom's take on Scott McClellan from a trust point of view. At what point does the PR "code of ethics" go out the window? Does the over-hyped virtue of trust ever take a backseat to truth?

Posted by Cal at May 30, 2008 3:37 PM


Good question, Cal. I took the test and it accurately describes me. Thanks.

Posted by Judith Ellis at May 30, 2008 6:00 PM


I've been asking my clients to take the Trust Quotient for one simple reason - most sellers have it all wrong. They believe they can either us tricks and tactics to get buyers to buy their offering or they are clueless about what makes them come across as trustworthy.

The Trust Quotient and the four factors that impact ones trustworthiness bring to light the importance of trust in selling, which trumps sales methodology every time.

Posted by Mark Slatin at November 3, 2008 4:59 PM



ARCHIVES

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.