(function(a){a.fn.hoverIntent=function(l,j){var m={sensitivity:7,interval:100,timeout:0};m=a.extend(m,j?{over:l,out:j}:l);var o,n,h,d;var e=function(f){o=f.pageX;n=f.pageY};var c=function(g,f){f.hoverIntent_t=clearTimeout(f.hoverIntent_t);if((Math.abs(h-o)+Math.abs(d-n))cathy mosca at March 12, 2010 11:14 AM


I agree that ho-hum is actually worse than awful. Being awful and being extraordinary cause an emotional response in people. Ho-hum is emotional limbo.

In today's decentralized world where a one-man business can position their business in extraordinary ways using web systems, other low cost technologies and tapping into a largely free and colossal knowledge base that is the web being extraordinary is easy that it might seem.

Let's take an accounting firm, one of the business types mentioned in Tom's video. Mostly they all do the same ho-hum things, even down to buying web resources off the same company and they all publish the same boring tax rule changes with a different logo.

Instead, they could a deal to purchase and redistribute on their website marketing strategy information for their clients. They could run free marketing seminars for their clients. The seminars could include easy but easy put into practice topics such as SEO, running a Google AdWords campaign, using Google to research your competitors.

Other ideas include:
Having a back-end web system with client log in where clients can for free upload weekly back-ups of their in-house accounting system and upload and tag their final end of year files ready for the accountant to do their stuff.

Using Twitter to communicate motivational and business tips to their clients.

Using Facebook and MySpace to commence building communication channels with new generations.

Sending out phone text reminders to certain generations of thei clients to "bring their info in so we can lodge your return"

Buying wholesale media space and on-selling it at cost to their clients to enable them to participate in otherwise un-affordable media plays

Setting up other whole of client base buying groups to help their clients reduce the costs of boring things like gas, paper, ink etc.

This is just a few minutes thought so imagine what an accounting firm brainstorm session could come up with. They would be extraordinary within a couple of weeks.

I believe the biggest hurdle to becoming extraordinary is wanting to become extraordinary, as there is perceived safety in ho-hum, because ho-hum is emotional limbo. Nobody is dazzled, nobody is upset.

Get some gumption and try extraordinary. The worst that can happen is you will upset someone, but so what.

Posted by Jason Bresnehan at March 12, 2010 4:06 PM


Ho-hum is not worse than awful. But people who say it can sound clever, because it's counterintuitive. Being counterintuitive is part of Tom's brand - it what people expect Tom to be. In other words, being counterintuitive is Ho-Hum. Its what you expect from Tom.

Burger King and McDonald's are Ho-Hum, but that is part of their success. You know what you are getting when you go to them. Variation is low, but that is what sells - that is what they sell.

Posted by zorro at March 12, 2010 8:25 PM


Zorro,

That's a fine point as far as it goes, but low variation and ho-hum are not necessarily equal. I enjoy using my Mac every day and consider it an exceptional experience even though I do pretty much the same things on it and, in a real sense, get little variation. Think also of a non-chain restaurant - no, scratch that, let's use a chain: sometimes we meet friends at Chick-Fil-A for a low-key dinner. The kids love the food, then run off and play until dragged away on the indoor jungle gym. Meanwhile, the employees offer to bring food to the table when they see you lugging diaper bags and toddlers, come by to ask about drink refills and, generally, show a lot more investment the experience than, well, Burger King or McDonald's.

Variation can be low and still be "wow."

Posted by Phil at March 15, 2010 9:03 AM


I suggest myself the following:

FIRST! ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO NURTURE
IS THAT ONE THAT REVOLTS WITHIN THE INNERMOST OF /BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR ETHICS.

SECOND! ONCE YOU DO YOUR ETHICS,
YOU CAN DO YOUR ACTIONABLE KNOWLEDGE.

THIRD! ONCE YOUR ACTIONABLE KNOWLEDGE IS DONE BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR CORPORATE PLANNING AND RESPECTIVE MARSHALED STRATEGY.

FOURTH! ONCE YOUR CORPORATE PLANNING AND RESPECTIVE MARSHALED STRATEGY
IS DONE BY YOU, YOU CAN DO YOUR SYSTEMS HAZARD MANAGEMENT.

FIFTH! ONCE YOUR SYSTEMS HAZARD MANAGEMENT IS DONE BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT.

SIXTH! ONCE YOUR CROSS-FUNCTIONAL SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT IS DONE BY YOU, YOU CAN DO YOUR SYSTEMS RELIABILITY ENGINEERING.

SEVENTH! ONCE YOUR SYSTEMS RELIABILITY ENGINEERING IS DONE BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR SYSTEMS RISK MANAGEMENT.

EIGHTH! ONCE YOUR SYSTEMS RISK MANAGEMENT IS DONE BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR FUTURE.

NINTH! WHEN YOUR FUTURE IS DONE BY YOU,
YOU CAN DO YOUR BENEFITS (UPSIDES AND DOWNSIDES).

TENTH! WHEN BENEFITS ARE DONE BY YOU AND
YOU BECOME HYPER-ENGAGE INTO PERVASIVELY TRANSFORMATIONAL
SELF-RENEWAL AND SELF-CHALLENGING (IN EXCELSIS) OF YOUR OWN INTELLECT,
YOU CAN DO YOUR SUSTAINABILITY PERPETUALLY.

ELEVENTH! NOW YOU CAN CONCEIVE AND DESIGN YOUR OWN PROFESSION AND TENURE WHILE CONCENTRATING IN CAPTURING WOMB-TO-TOMB (SO-CALLED) “SUCCESS.”

TWELFTH! NEITHER “THE SECRET,” NOR THE “HIDDEN SECRET,” MAGNIFICENT MARKETING STUNTS, WILL WARRANT THE OXYGEN THAT YOUR MIND, BODY, AND SOULS REQUIRE (SIC).

www.linkedin.com/in/AndresAgostini

Posted by Andres Agostini at March 17, 2010 12:18 AM



ARCHIVES

- May 2013

- April 2013

- March 2013

- February 2013

- January 2013

- December 2012

- November 2012

- October 2012

- September 2012

- August 2012

- July 2012

- June 2012

- May 2012

- April 2012

- March 2012

- February 2012

- January 2012

- December 2011

- November 2011

- October 2011

- September 2011

- August 2011

- July 2011

- June 2011

- May 2011

- April 2011

- March 2011

- February 2011

- January 2011

- December 2010

- November 2010

- October 2010

- September 2010

- August 2010

- July 2010

- June 2010

- May 2010

- April 2010

- March 2010

- February 2010

- January 2010

- December 2009

- November 2009

- October 2009

- September 2009

- August 2009

- July 2009

- June 2009

- May 2009

- April 2009

- March 2009

- February 2009

- January 2009

- December 2008

- November 2008

- October 2008

- September 2008

- August 2008

- July 2008

- June 2008

- May 2008

- April 2008

- March 2008

- February 2008

- January 2008

- December 2007

- November 2007

- October 2007

- September 2007

- August 2007

- July 2007

- June 2007

- May 2007

- April 2007

- March 2007

- February 2007

- January 2007

- December 2006

- November 2006

- October 2006

- September 2006

- August 2006

- July 2006

- June 2006

- May 2006

- April 2006

- March 2006

- February 2006

- January 2006

- December 2005

- November 2005

- October 2005

- September 2005

- August 2005

- July 2005

- June 2005

- May 2005

- April 2005

- March 2005

- February 2005

- January 2005

- December 2004

- November 2004

- October 2004

- September 2004

- August 2004

- July 2004

- June 2004

- May 2004

- April 2004

Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.

What Tom's Reading Archives

- February 2004

- August 2003

- March 2003

- September 2002

- March 2002

- September 2001

- April 2001

- March 2001

- June 2000

- September 1999

OBSERVATIONS ARCHIVES

- July 2004

- April 2004

- February 2004

- May 2003

- March 2003

- June 2002

- April 2002

- March 2002

- February 2002

- January 2002

- December 2001

- November 2001

- October 2001

- September 2001

- August 2001

- February 2001

- January 2001

- December 2000

- November 2000

- October 2000

- September 2000

- August 2000

- July 2000

- June 2000

- May 2000

- April 2000

- March 2000

- February 2000

- January 2000

- December 1999

- November 1999

- October 1999

- September 1999

right now

What we're talking about
on the front page.