My great friend Bob Stone, among other things former head of the (largely) stealth successes of VP Gore's re-inventing government program, dug up a paper of mine which he plans to use in his current professorial job. Bob's Success Secret #1 (in my opinion) is cultivating change by providing positive role models, rather than focusing on what's broken (the negative stuff). Here's my favorite Stoneism: "Some people look for things that went wrong and try to fix them. I look for things that went right, and try to build off them."
Love it!
At any rate, we're attaching here the paper of mine that Bob's using. It focuses on the peril of a "systems first" approach to Big Change, arguing that systems are of the utmost importance, but mostly fail, or fail to reach their full potential by a country mile, because the organization's "culture" does not support them. Hence a "culture first" approach is usually/invariably the better bet. The paper is argued via 11 case studies from every setting imaginable.
Enjoy!
The latest addition to Tom's "Mother of All Presentations" (MOAP) is available now at ExcellenceNow.com. You can download it as a PowerPoint or a PDF. We've been releasing a new section every other week throughout 2012.
Part 21 continues the "15H Theory of Everything" with "Hewlett," and it puts the limelight on the Professional Service Firm, Tom's model for a transformational business. That is, one that offers to provide not just customer satisfaction, but, instead, customer success.
Posted yesterday: "A manifesto for the new rules on human capital." Tom wrote a column by this title for the Financial Times, and if you register at their site, you can get access through this link. In the article, Tom argues that the "changing nature of work—and the wildly accelerating effectiveness of technology"—is "both the number one problem and the number one opportunity for businesses and wider society."
Now at ExcellenceNow.com: Part 17 of Tom's "Mother of All Presentations" (MOAP). You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We're releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
Part 17 brings us the 10th "H" in Tom's "15H Theory of Everything," the "H" in this case standing for Harley-Davidson. Take some lessons from this iconic company and maybe one day your customers will tattoo your logo onto their chests.
Part 15 of Tom's "Mother of All Presentations" (MOAP) is featured now at ExcellenceNow.com. You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We'll be releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
This latest section of the MOAP introduces the 8th "H" in Tom's "15H Theory of Everything." In this presentation, the "H" stands for Gary Hamel, the highly regarded business thinker. Tom's theme is "You are who you hang out with." So, who are you going to lunch with?
I admit I was intimidated by the conference title of my recent high-visibility event in Seoul; namely, "Reframing Capitalism." And further intimidated by the fact that a passel of Nobel laureates in economics would be addressing the issue. Then it occurred to me that the mid- to long-term "reframing" was more about recasting the nature of work/jobs in, for example, the face of 2020's artificial intelligence than about whether the Spanish bailout is $100 billion or $400 billion—as nontrivial as the latter is. I.e., what the hell will the world's four billion or so workers be doing, say, 10 years from now? I'm not sure that sophisticated econometric analyses will be all that helpful in determining an answer. Hence what follows, which is surely the roughest of first drafts. (The complete document is reproduced here—and is also available in PDF and PowerPoint formats.)
A 15-Point Human Capital Development Manifesto
at the Enterprise and National Government Level/HCD2020
"In some sense you can argue that the science fiction scenario is already starting to happen. The computers are in control. We just live in their world."—Danny Hillis
"Human creativity is the ultimate economic resource."—Richard Florida
"Every child is born an artist. The trick is to remain an artist."—Picasso
"Knowledge becomes obsolete incredibly fast. The continuing professional education of adults is the No.1 industry in the next 30 years."—Peter Drucker
"If you want staff to give great service, give great service to staff."—Ari Weinzweig
In mid-June 2012 I spoke at a major event in Seoul, Korea: World Strategy Forum/The New Rules: Reframing Capitalism. Predictably the discussion focused on global financial infrastructure. To ignore that would have been insanity. On the other hand, I believe that mid- to long-term employment/unemployment is even more affected by the changing nature of work—and the wildly accelerating effectiveness of technology, such as artificial intelligence, in encompassing activities that engage tens upon tens of millions of people, especially in the OECD nations. I believe this is our #1 problem—and #1 opportunity. Confronting the nature and extent of future employment is required for reasons of economic survival and growth—and for reasons of social and political stability. Having created here in a single paragraph the oceanic basis for what follows, I must admit that it was instead a mundane question (Question #1) in an interview before my speech that triggered this "manifesto." Namely: "Dr. Peters, how would you define the changing nature of corporate social responsibility in these uncertain times?" Herewith, in effect, my response—which, quite honestly, came as a surprise to me:
1. "Corporate social responsibility" starts at home—i.e., inside the enterprise! MAXIMIZING GDD/Gross Domestic Development of the workforce is the primary source of mid-term and beyond growth and profitability—and maximizes national productivity and wealth. (The profitability axiom: If you want to serve the customer with uniform Excellence, then you must FIRST effectively and faithfully serve those who serve the customer—i.e., our employees, via maximizing tools and professional development.)
2. Regardless of the transient external situation, development of "human capital" is always the #1 priority. This is true in general, in particular in difficult times which demand resilience—and uniquely true in this age in which IMAGINATIVE
brainwork is de facto the only plausible survival strategy for higher wage nations. (Generic "brainwork," traditional and dominant "white-collar activities, is increasingly being performed by exponentially enhanced artificial intelligence.)
3. Three-star generals and admirals (and symphony conductors and sports coaches and police chiefs and fire chiefs) OBSESS about training. Why is it an almost dead certainty that in a random 30-minute interview you are unlikely to hear a CEO touch upon this topic? (I would hazard a guess that most CEOs see IT investments as a "strategic necessity," but see training expenses as "a necessary evil.")
4. Proposition/axiom: The CTO/Chief TRAINING Officer is arguably the #1 staff job in the enterprise, at least on a par with, say, the CFO or CIO or head of R&D. (Again, external circumstances—see immediately above—are forcing our hand.)
5. The training budget takes precedence over the capital budget. PERIOD. It's easier fun to get your picture taken next to a new machine. But how do you get a photo of a new and much improved attitude in a key distribution center? But the odds are 25:1 that the new attitude will add more to the bottom line than will the glorious state-of-the-art machine.
***************
In the 3rd quarter of 2011 manufacturing output went up 4.7 percent—one heck of an accomplishment. But there was a catch, and a big one. Gross hours worked in manufacturing went down 0.6 percent. Such ratios are becoming commonplace—and in services as much or more than in manufacturing. As we automate damn near everything and as that trend accelerates (been in an auto plant lately—where are the people?), output is dramatically outstripping labor usage. Great for productivity, borderline terrifying for workers. This "manifesto" is written with such numbers in mind—not only does that not mean that it's neo-Luddite, but, in fact, the opposite. Timid strategies will not address the employment issue. Education and job content must be turned upside down—in short order.
***************
6. Human capital development should routinely sit atop any agenda or document associated with enterprise strategy. Most any initiative you undertake should formally address implications for and contributions to human capital asset development.
7. Every individual on the payroll should have a benchmarked professional growth strategy. Every leader at every level should be evaluated in no small measure on the collective effectiveness of individual growth strategies—that is, each individual's absolute growth is of direct relevance to every leader's assessed performance.
8. Given that we ceaselessly lament the "leadership deficit," it is imperative and just plain vanilla common sense, that we maximize the rate of development of women leaders at every level—little if anything has a higher priority. (It is an outrage that this has not been the case until now—and is still not the case in far too many institutions.) (And, while there are no guarantees, women are more likely dispositionally to take a shine to the imperative of maximizing human asset development.)
9. Maximum utilization of and continued development of "older workers" (to age 70—or even beyond?) is a source of immense organizational and national growth and wealth. The rapidly aging population, with oldies far more healthy and vital than ever, ought to be an opportunity rather than a pain-in-the-butt to deal with.
10. The practical key to all human asset development activities is the 1st-line manager. ("Sergeants run the Army" is an accurate commonplace. observation—supported by development resources.) Hence development of the full cadre of 1st-line managers is an urgent—and invariably underplayed—strategic imperative. Arguably, the collective quality and development trajectory of 1st-line leaders is an organization's #1 human asset development priority. (Consistent with all the above, the 1st-line leader's skill at "people development" is her or his top priority—for which she or he must be rigorously and continually trained.)
11. The national education infrastructure—from kindergarten to continuing adult education—may well be National Priority #1. Moreover, the educational infrastructure must be altered radically to underpin support for the creative jobs that will be more or less the sole basis of future employment and national growth and wealth creation.
12. Associated with the accelerated priority of the national education infrastructure is a dramatically enhanced and appreciated and compensated role for our teachers—this must necessarily be accompanied by rigorous accountability. There is no doubt that "teaching" (instilling) insatiable curiosity, say, which is the #1 attribute of a creative person, is no easy task; however, there is no way that it can be ducked if one looks at future definitions of employability.
13. The great majority of us work in small enterprises; hence national growth objectives based upon human capital development MUST necessarily extend "downward" to even 1-person enterprises. Collective productivity improvement through human capital development among small businesses has an unimaginably large—and underappreciated—payoff. While many small businesses appreciate the notion, they are unprepared to take the steps necessary to engage their, say, dozen employees in seeking productivity improvements.
14. Needless to say, the activities imagined here will only be possible if abetted by a peerless National Information and Communication Infrastructure. Indeed, the work here is being done—and the need is appreciated and reasonably well funded. The effort must not falter; the new information-based tools are the coin of the realm.
15. Associated with the above is a RADICAL reorientation of leadership education and development—throughout the enterprise/education/continuing education infrastructure. (E.g., Among other things, the MBA and executive education will require open-heart surgery—aimed at shifting focus from finance and marketing to human resource development.) To deal with the most likely future employment scenarios, leaders will need to be masters of the liberal arts—said arts are, again, the determinant of responding to the emerging world.
The agenda implied by the above "manifesto" is bold—and its moorings are a long way from where we are today. But this or something rather like it falls into a category labeled—not optional
Available now at ExcellenceNow.com is Part 14 of Tom's "Mother of All Presentations." You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We'll be releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
This is the 7th "H" in Tom's "15H Theory of Everything," named for H. Ross Perot. Its theme is "Ready. Fire! Aim." Planning is overrated. Do something.

While reading Henry Chesbrough's masterful 2011 Open Services Innovation, I was reminded of our 1999 triumvirate of books in our Re-inventing Work series. In particular, The Professional Service Firm50: Fifty Ways to Transform Your "Department" Into a Professional Service Firm Whose Trademarks Are Passion and Innovation. (You can get it on Kindle, or used hardback, starting at, ta da, $0.01.) I have also attached a "PSF" PowerPoint presentation from 2007, unfortunately not annotated.
Specifically, this post is in response to a 0608 tweet.
(Photo above, courtesy Tom's iPhone 4S, is the "beauty bush" outside his home office.)
Now available on YouTube, a new video in The Little BIG Things series. In this clip, Tom relates a personal experience to highlight his message—put a personal touch into any presentation to form that all-important connection with your audience, whether it be a roomful or a lone listener.
You can find the video in the right-hand column of this page or watch it at YouTube (time: 2 minutes 30 seconds). Or, get a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Personalization Is Important.
The next installment of Tom's "Mother of All Presentations," or MOAP, is Part 8, available now at ExcellenceNow.com. You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We'll be releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
With Part 8, Tom begins his "15H Theory of Everything." This presentation, based on lessons from Conrad Hilton, has this as its main message: Execution Is Strategy.
Is it the engineer in me? Quite possibly. At any rate, you'll find a set of lists dating back several years here. It starts out with one that goes to 219 (!) items—in short, stuff I believe. At any rate, all yours in the FYI modality.
Quotes Concerning "A Bias for Action"
"Attribute No. 1," In Search of Excellence
Messing around with my favorite topic—the primacy of action over blah blah blah. Put together two attachments. One is a PowerPoint. The other is a set of quotes—the first ten of which are offered up below.
The "Big 10":
"We have a 'strategic plan.' It's called doing things."—Herb Kelleher
"This is so simple it sounds stupid, but it is amazing how few oil people really understand that you only find oil if you drill wells. You may think you're finding it when you're drawing maps and studying logs, but you have to drill."—John Masters, Canadian oil and gas wildcatter, The Hunters
"Can do!"—Motto, U.S. Navy Seabees (U.S. Naval Mobile Construction Battalions)
"Execution is the job of the business leader."—Larry Bossidy & Ram Charan/ Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done
"Ready. FIRE! Aim."—H. Ross Perot (versus, he said, the far more common "Aim! Aim! Aim! ...")
"BLAME NO ONE. EXPECT NOTHING. DO SOMETHING."—Locker room sign
posted by NFL football coach Bill Parcells
"Thinking is the enemy of creativity. It's self-conscious and anything self-conscious is lousy. You simply must ... Do things."—Ray Bradbury
"To Be somebody or to Do something."—John Boyd
"Fall seven times, stand up eight."—Japanese proverb
"You miss 100% of the shots you never take."—Wayne Gretzky
We've posted the latest video in The Little BIG Things series on YouTube. Do you think it's impossible to measure innovation? In this video, Tom offers a brilliantly simple, easy-to-implement method for ensuring that a good portion of your work meets the mark on innovation.
You can find the video in the right-hand column of this page or watch it at YouTube (time: 2 minutes 3 seconds). Or, get a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Measure Innovation.
The latest installment of Tom's "Mother of All Presentations," or MOAP, is now available at ExcellenceNow.com. You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We'll be releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
Part 4 introduces Tom's conviction that encouraging your people to make friends in other functions of the organization should be a top priority. Tom says you should reward such behavior, make it an agenda item. Download Part 4 of Tom's Mother of All Presentations, and learn how and why cross-functional socialization (read, idea-sharing) is essential to business excellence.
The next installment from Tom's "Mother of All Presentations" or MOAP, at ExcellenceNow.com is now available. You can download the PowerPoint version or a PDF. We'll be releasing a section every other week throughout 2012.
What's Part 3 all about? Given that worker satisfaction in the job is intricately tied to worker satisfaction with their supervisor, Tom sees selecting, training, and nurturing your first-line supervisors as a mandatory strategic part of business practice. I put it mildly. Download Part 3 of Tom's Mother of All Presentations to get his take—that is, care of first-line supervisors should be an obsession.
We add another video to The Little BIG Things series on YouTube. In the spirit of the coming New Year, it offers, perhaps, a suggestion for change you might plan to make in the year to come. According to Tom, one of the most important practices you adopt should be the apology. Three minutes, BIG impact.
You can find the video in the right-hand column of this page or watch it at YouTube (time: 1 minute 49 seconds). Or, get a PDF transcript of the video's content: Brand You: Three-Minute Apologies.
[Guest post by Ian Sanders, who has posted here before. He is an author, ideas guy, and marketing expert. His new book, co-written with David Sloly, is Zoom! The Faster Way To Make Your Business Idea Happen (published by Financial Times Prentice Hall). See more at www.iansanders.com.]
When I was researching my new book Zoom!, I got in touch with Tom to get his take on the essential ingredient for success. Despite all the demands on Tom's time, he sent me a reply just a couple of days later.
Tom's speed of response was echoed by a line in his email: "I've only learned one thing in 40 years of business: 'He who tries the most stuff the fastest wins.'"
This was music to my ears. Being rapid in business has a bad press. If you're launching a business fast or turning an idea into reality in days not weeks, people assume that by fast-tracking, quality suffers. Not so. Speed is the factor that can make a difference in the marketplace, speed can beat the competition, speed can get you customers.
Because it's not having the idea that wins; it is—of course—about how quickly you execute. Software start-ups have known this for a long time, where in the long tail of the apps market, developers make their products fit for purpose and launch early, rather than wait until they're perfect. "Fit for purpose" means while it's still a prototype, you're shipping a product of value—it has to do its job, solve the problem, fix the headache. Getting it out early, listening to user feedback, and making adaptations as you go keep you ahead of the competition.
Speed is a business lesson that any organisation can learn; it's not just for start-ups. Whether it's a product launch or a new division being started, making it happen fast is critical. Too many organisations get so stuck in internal procedures they lose focus on just getting it done. Ideas are mulled over in meetings, those meetings run overtime, and decisions get carried over to the next month. What would have been a brilliant, "WOW" idea if it was launched in 10 or 30 days becomes weak when it is finally launched, diluted, 100 days later. But it doesn't have to be that way.
Venture capitalist and former chief evangelist of Apple Guy Kawasaki backs this up. When I spoke to him for Zoom!, Guy said that making your business happen fast is about shipping your product to real life customers. "I'm not saying you should ship a piece of crap: you should ship something great. But if you try to ship something great that is perfect, you're going to take too long. You'll learn more about your product in the first week after shipping than 52 weeks thinking about and studying and doing focus groups."
So whatever business you're in, try thinking like a software company and apply speed to make your idea happen. It's better to launch "in beta" rather than to procrastinate and get stuck in business planning. Or should that be 'business guessing"—after all, who knows what will happen in five years' time? The idea that launches fastest is the one that succeeds; "done" is often better than "perfect."
Don't be one of those people who had a great business idea but got beaten to launch. Put your foot on the accelerator and make it happen: give it some Zoom!
There is a lot of talk about "adaptive organizations," as there should be. In these perilous and fast-changing times, adaptivity is arguably Skill/Goal #1—and the bones of those, old and young, who failed to adapt litter the landscape.
Books can be and have been and will be written about the topic. Dozens of 'em. But I want to pound a stake into the ground. I doubtless wildly over-simplify, but I insist that there is a one-variable answer to the adaptivity issue—moreover, treatment of that variable is "the" answer to this conundrum and it has been with us, unchanged, for eons. It has been the determining success-fail, life-death factor for companies and armies alike.
In short: Adaptivity is more or less a 100% function of the workforce and how it is recruited and developed and encouraged and appreciated—or not.
Adaptive organizations will have workforces which ...
*Are hired for attitude and character and proven teamwork as much or more than for skill
*Are respected and trusted and visibly appreciated and celebrated
*Are in on pretty much everything in an environment of information sharing and transparency
*Are trained and re-trained ad infinitum—you can, in effect, never spend too much time or money on training and re-training
*Treat "learning new stuff"—each and every day—as a near holy responsibility
*Believe that every one of us and every outsider has something worthy to teach us
*Are routinely exposed to an "insane" variety of outsiders who offer constant stimulation and direct challenges to conventional organizational/marketplace wisdom
*Are given the autonomy (with concomitant accountability) to and encouragement to "try it," almost any "it," at the drop of a hat—and then try it and try it again and again
*Are guaranteed that "useful failures" are cheered rather than jeered
*Are bound by a coda that shouts "good enough is never good enough"
*Are all "dreamers with deadlines," committed to pursuit of the novel and disruptive—and equally committed to flawless and timely execution
*Laugh a lot at themselves and their foibles and pratfalls
*Are, while civil to a fault, irreverent about damn near anything other than integrity and decency
*Are responsible for each other's mentoring and growth
*Believe that their role—each and everyone—is to serve, to serve each other and to serve each member of our family of organizations (vendors, customers, communities, etc.)
*Are diverse to a fault—not legalistically diverse, but from every background imaginable
*Are insistent that each and every one is treated as an utterly indispensable member
of the team—there are no bit players
*Relentlessly pursue no less than EXCELLENCE in all we do, in tough times even more than in times of economic good health
And that's it!
(Or some list more or less like this.)
Of course the above requires inspired leadership which truly puts people first.
Blah.
Blah.
Blah.
Bottom line: If the workforce encapsulates the above ideas—adaptivity will be virtually automatic and a walk in the park.* (*Of course it won't be any such thing—but presumably you get the drift.)
FYI/I repeat: This is an incredibly un-new idea. (It's achievement is, alas, exceedingly unusual—but it has unmistakably been "the secret" for ages.)
Translation (if I was unclear):
A soaring vision is desirable.
An effective strategy is important.
Super-processes are a necessity.
But in the end, it's all about ... THE PEOPLE!*
*It's ALWAYS all about ... THE PEOPLE!
[Ed. This blog is also available as a PDF: "Adaptive" Organizations.]
(Above and below, taking trip #1 in my new 12-foot Vermont Packboat amidst fall foliage on Lake St. Catherine. Photo courtesy Susan Sargent; boat designed and built by Adirondack Guideboat, North Ferrisburgh VT.)
(This is a guest post from Alexandra Levit, whose new book, Blind Spots: The 10 Business Myths You Can't Afford to Believe on Your New Path to Success, is released today. She is Money Magazine's 2010 Online Career Expert of the Year and a winner of Forbes' 2011 Best Websites for Women. She interviewed Tom, and he invited her to submit this post.)
Forget Overnight Success and Learn to Be Persistent
Overnight success is one of the most widely held beliefs in the business world. It's also hugely misleading, and adopting this idea that you can easily become an overnight success could actually be quite damaging for your career and life. The truth is simple. There are very few—if any—genuine cases of overnight success. The majority of successful people have dedicated themselves to a goal and persevered for a long time before reaching a high level of achievement that is finally noticed and talked about by others.
Perseverance is defined as remaining constant to a purpose, idea, or task in spite of obstacles. Some people are born with the tendency to persevere. In fact, I can already see it in my young son. He likes to push his wagon around our backyard, but he doesn't always have enough strength and control to move it where he wants it to go. However, instead of giving up and crying, he faithfully pushes at the wagon from different angles until it's free of the tree or fence.
Pick up any one of Horatio Alger's rags-to-riches stories, and you'll be virtually hit over the head with the lesson that earlier generations didn't expect instant gratification the way we do today. If they had, we wouldn't have had the opportunity to evolve as fully as a society, with the most critical cultural and technological advances marinating over decades. We've become a society of now, now, now, but the truth is that most things worth having take a little bit of process and a lot of time. You shouldn't assume that if something doesn't manifest overnight that it won't happen at all, and, in fact, you will do wonders for your personal development if you can learn to be patient, maintain faith in your own potential, and increase your perseverance in driving important aspects of your career forward.
While it admittedly sounds a bit corny, the first step in this journey is to believe in yourself and what you want to do. If you try for a goal, but in the back of your mind you don't actually think you can accomplish it, you will wreck havoc on and sabotage your motivation. You will probably give up more easily, which will result in even poorer self-esteem. If you're like me and believing in yourself is sometimes challenging, you might talk to family members, friends, a psychologist, or a coach to address your doubts and insecurities head on.
Self-awareness is a critical part of developing perseverance. Admitting that you're the type to give up on a goal before you've completed it is the first step in changing that pattern. Then, practice keeping promises to yourself by setting small goals and refusing to quit until you've achieved them.
Another component is self-control. And how do you improve that? As John Tierney reported in the New York Times in 2008, research from University of Miami psychologists Michael McCullough and David Willoughby concludes that finding your religion may be the right move, since religiosity is correlated with higher self-control. Brain scans show that when people pray, the parts of the brain responsible for self-regulation and control of attention and emotion get a major workout. If you tend toward the agnostic, you can still get the self-control benefit by meditating privately or by getting involved with an organization that shares your values.
The final component in enhancing your perseverance is to think positively. Because you're human and not a cartoon character, it is difficult to have a positive attitude 100 percent of the time. When something unfortunate occurs, it's natural to feel negative emotions like anger, frustration, and sadness at first. But holding on to these until they result in constant depression and anxiety will make it all that much harder to persevere at a difficult goal.
(Read more about the book Blind Spots at
Penguin.ca and see Alexandra's blog at alexandralevit.typepad.com.)
"Gawd I do good work."
Disgusting!
Nonetheless ...
I rarely say such things, but I think your organizational world would work more effectively if you "obsessed" on those "REALLY First Things Before First Things." Please consider discussing this doc with colleagues.
I really cannot remember the last time—maybe this is the first time?—I have felt so determined about something I've written.
Sorry if the self-promotion puts you off—at least it's for a free product/pdf.
[Our guest blogger is Cool Friend Steve Yastrow. He's an author, speaker, consultant, and we've enjoyed his work for many years. Find out more about him at Yastrow.com.]
In a recent post, Tom quoted David Lascelles to show how corporate mergers are contrary to nature. Lascelles uses bees as an example, relating that bee colonies split into separate colonies as they grow, before becoming too big. Lascelles says that nature is more about "growth, fragmentation, and dispersal" than it is about merging. "What the bees are telling us is that the corporate world has got it all wrong."
Beyond Lascelles's bees, there is another example, even closer to home, to demonstrate this point: humans.
For about 90% of the 200,000 years we have been anatomically modern humans we lived in bands that maxed out at about 150 people. When our groups started to grow beyond 150 people, we split into smaller groups that then continued to grow on their own, until they once again split. Anthropologist Robin Dunbar says that this number of 150 was meaningful: It represents the maximum number of relationships each of us can have with other people. The "Dunbar Number," as it is called, is a natural limit based on our cognitive capacity. (Dunbar shows that other primates, such as chimps, bonobos, orangutans, and gorillas, have proportionally smaller group sizes based on their smaller brains.)
Then, about 12,000 years ago we started to settle down into a sedentary "civilized" lifestyle, and shortly thereafter developed agriculture. This led us to live in larger groups, well past Dunbar's limit of 150 people, eventually leading to the urban centers we see today.
Although we usually think of the transition to agriculture and civilization as wonderful progress, it isn't so simple. In his book, Pandora's Seed: The Unforeseen Cost of Civilization, Spencer Wells paints a very vivid picture of the ills that civilized life has brought us. Wells describes archaeological evidence that shows how human size, health, and life expectancy actually decreased after the transition to settled living and agriculture. (Wells says that life expectancy for humans who made it past childhood didn't catch up with hunter-gatherer levels until the 19th century.) He claims that warfare, mental illness, and social strife, in addition to many diseases, are all byproducts of the unnatural situations we have lived in for the past 10,000 years. We evolved to live one way, and now are trying to live another way. What we see every day as our natural setting is, in fact, a very unnatural way for us to live.
So, if we are looking for evidence from nature that our belief in corporate mergers and unchecked growth is misplaced, Lascelles's bees are only the starting point. We can also look into the not-so-distant mirror of our own history and recognize that our real success on this planet has been based on small, nimble groups who "spin off" new groups before growing too big.
Tom, as is his usual habit, continued to work on his article for the Financial Times after he posted it here last week. So, we'd like to present the new intro along with a link to a PDF of the final product, complete with four appendices. Here, then:
REALLY First Things Before First Things
I was initially trained as an engineer. (And have an MBA as well.) That essentially means that I am a slave to linear, logical analysis. Hence my presentations start at the start and I carefully build a logical structure for all that follows.
Fair enough. Except I frequently find that critical things I want to say are buried or not gotten around to. Hence, about a year ago I shrugged off my logical halter and decided to say what I thought was important, come what may, at the top of my remarks.
Hence what follows ...
Consideration of business strategy, approaches to product development, and the like are of the utmost importance to enterprise success. Yet there are other factors—perhaps mundane at first glance—that are the true differentiators between mediocrity and excellence. I'll touch upon four, which I call "REALLY First Things Before First Things." Most will agree that each one is important. But my goal is to induce you to convert them into strategic obsessions—if you do, I sincerely believe the world will be your oyster, or at least your enterprise will function quite a bit more effectively.
(Note: The Financial Times published a column of mine on 29 August. Editors must edit—and they did. All writers think editors are heartless; some writers, lucky enough to have blogs, can post the version they first submitted. Here it is, 1,200 words rather than the 700 that eventually appeared in print.)
There is no logic to this column.
Which is precisely the point.
I was initially trained as an engineer. (And have an MBA as well.) That essentially means that I am a slave to linear, logical analysis. Hence my presentations start at the start and I carefully build a logical structure for all that follows.
Fair enough. Except I frequently find that critical things I want to say get left out or buried. Hence, about a year ago I threw off my logical halter and decided to say what I thought was important, come what may, at the top of my remarks.
Consideration of business strategy, approaches to product development, and the like, are of the utmost importance to enterprise success. Yet there are other factors—perhaps mundane at first glance—that are the true differentiators between mediocrity and excellence. I'll touch upon four, which I call "First Things Before First Things." Most will agree that each one is important. But my goal is to induce you to convert them into strategic obsessions.
Front-line managers. If the regimental commander lost most of his 2nd lieutenants and 1st lieutenants and captains and majors, it would be a tragedy. If he lost his sergeants it would be a catastrophe. The Army is fully aware that success on the battlefield is dependent to an extraordinary degree on its sergeants. Does industry "get it"?
Research by the likes of Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman, reported in First, Break All the Rules, demonstrates that the first-line manager is the single most important key to employee satisfaction, retention—and productivity. No matter how fine the organization, if the employee is sour on his immediate boss, her or his performance will significantly suffer. I am not suggesting that execs don't take the front-line boss seriously. I am suggesting that, unlike the Army, they are not obsessed with developing their full cadre of front-line managers as a primary strategic asset and engine of enterprise performance! For starters: Are your font-line boss selection and training and mentoring processes unmistakably "knock-your-socks-off"/"best-in-class"?
Cross-functional excellence. Look at any organizational failure, and poor cross-functional integration is more often than not the chief culprit. Within an engineering company, for example, research, marketing and finance are routinely at each other's throats. The result is a critical new product comes to market 18 months late. Or take the local police and federal police: Each have the fight against terrorism as their pre-eminent goal—but frequently refuse to share all their data with one another. I chose in introducing this topic the word "excellence," as in "cross-functional excellence." That is, the idea here is not merely about "removing barriers." It is about what I believe is no less than the #1 opportunity to achieve competitive dominance—e.g., cut new-product development by, say, 50 percent or even more.
I have the utmost respect for Oracle and SAP. But this is not primarily a software issue. Or, rather, it is—but a softer form of software. Secret #1 (yes, I'll go that far) is "Let's do lunch." In fact I insist that bosses literally measure their direct reports on the number of lunches per month they have with members of other functions!
It works like this: Joe in procurement invites Sam in finance to lunch. Odds are high that along the way they discover a host of connections—e.g., both have eighth-graders in the same school. Joe will still tenaciously represent his "function" and Sam his—but the tenor of interactions is likely to change significantly, if not dramatically, from "gotcha" to something approaching "How can we jointly add maximum value?"
I call thing like "doing lunch" the "social accelerants" of cross-functional excellence. I can muster a list of 25 in a flash—e.g., present small weekly awards to those in other functions who have helped your team-function move forward. One should not promise miracles lightly, but taken together these notions can lead to miracles of the first order.
"Strategic" listening. Harvard M.D. Jerome Groopman wrote a fascinating book titled How Doctors Think. Dr. Groopman claims, not terribly surprisingly, that the best source for a doctor concerning the patient's complaint is—the patient. Yet he goes on to cite research showing that on average the doctor interrupts the patient after ... 18 seconds. I'll bet you a bundle that the average manager does not surpass the 18-second mark!
Like developing first-line managers and trying to improve cross-functional coordination, most bosses would agree that listening is "important." But, again, do they make it a strategic obsession? Because beyond a shadow of doubt that is precisely what listening per se should be.
I made a list of the things that flow from effective listening ("strategic listening" or "aggressive listening" as I prefer to call it). Listening is ...
the heart and soul of engagement,
the heart and soul of recognition,
the heart and soul of strategic partnering,
the heart and soul of learning,
the heart and soul of customer connections.
And on.
And on.
As with all things important, the key is becoming a serious student and practitioner. In fact I'll go so far as to say that listening per se is/can be a "profession" ... as much as playing the cello or flying a commercial aircraft.
Meetings. Find me a boss (or non-boss) who doesn't constantly bitch about "too many meetings"—I've never found one. But here is the irreducible fact of "boss-world": Meetings are what bosses do. There is no escape. And if that is true, then, also by definition, meetings are therefore the principal platform, or theater, in which every boss projects her or his leadership skills.
Immutable "bottom line": Every meeting that does not stir the imagination and curiosity of attendees, and increase bonding and co-operation and engagement and sense of worth, and motivate rapid action and enhance enthusiasm is a permanently lost opportunity. Call that a stretch if you wish—but then please explain to me why it is not the self-evident truth!
Let me be clear: This is not a rant about "conducting better meetings." This is a rant about the heart and soul and hour-to-hour reality of leadership effectiveness. One obvious implication: Prepare for a meeting/every meeting as if your professional life and legacy depended on it. Because it does.
There they are: "First things before first things." None, I strongly suspect, would disagree with the fact that all four are "important," even "very important." But it is my claim here that the four are in fact the "guts" of effective organizations—and, in fact, sustainable competitive advantage. Make each of these an "obsession"—and watch the bottom line soar.
Now at YouTube, the latest video of The Little BIG Things Video Series, in which Tom explains that following best practices as a business strategy can be effective ... or not.
You can find the video in the right-hand column of our front page, or watch it here (Time: 2 minutes 21 seconds). Also available is a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Best Practices.
I have about 3K slides in my "Master Presentation." These are either "the most important," or, surely, in the Top 1%:
Arie De Geus, The Living Company (father of "scenario planning" at Royal Dutch Shell): "Rose gardeners face a choice every spring. The long-term fate of a rose garden depends on this decision. If you want to have the largest and most glorious roses of the neighborhood, you will prune hard. This represents a policy of low tolerance and tight control. You force the plant to make the maximum use of its available resources, by putting them into the rose's 'core business.' Pruning hard is a dangerous policy in an unpredictable environment. Thus, if you are in a spot where you know nature may play tricks on you, you may opt for a policy of high tolerance. You will never have the biggest roses, but you have a much-enhanced chance of having roses every year. You will achieve a gradual renewal of the plant. In short, tolerant pruning achieves two ends: (1) It makes it easier to cope with unexpected environmental changes. (2) It leads to a continuous restructuring of the plant. The policy of tolerance admittedly wastes resources—the extra buds drain away nutrients from the main stem. But in an unpredictable environment, this policy of tolerance makes the rose healthier in the long run."
David Lascelles, Co-director of The Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation [UK]: "Since merger mania is now the rage, what lessons can the bees teach us? A simple one: Merging is not in nature. [Nature's] process is the exact opposite: one of growth, fragmentation and dispersal. There is no megalomania, no merging for merging's sake. The point is that unlike corporations, which just get bigger, bee colonies know when the time has come to split up into smaller colonies which can grow value faster. What the bees are telling us is that the corporate world has got it all wrong."
This week we add number 61 from The Little BIG Things Video Series. In this video at YouTube, Tom reminds us that branding efforts go only so far unless accompanied by an emphasis on people, i.e., the talent.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 1 minute 55 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Brand Equals Talent.
It's time for a new section in The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series. The next section in The Little BIG Things: 163 Ways to Pursue Excellence is titled "Special Section: The Heart of Business Strategy.'" Here's how Tom describes this section:
I humbly offer the following 51 pieces of "commonplace advice"—"reminders of the obvious" (as opposed to marketing "cleverness" or "devious 'strategic' maneuvers" or financial legerdemain) for creating a "winning" "strategy" that is inherently sustainable.
You can download a free pdf of this section from The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series* by clicking below:
#46 Special Section: The Heart of Business Strategy
*The Synopsis Series is an adaptation that gives you a taste of the BIG idea in each of the 163 Little BIG Things. More information on the book can be found on this page. The Synopsis Series as released thus far can be found here.
It's time for two new sections in The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series. The next two sections in The Little BIG Things: 163 Ways to Pursue Excellence are titled "Grunge" and "Enterprise." The Grunge section covers execution and common sense while Enterprise is a guide to the principles of doing Excellent work.
You can download free pdfs of those sections from The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series* by clicking below:
*The Synopsis Series is an adaptation that gives you a taste of the BIG idea in each of the 163 Little BIG Things. More information on the book can be found on this page. The Synopsis Series as released thus far can be found here.
Here's video number 54 from The Little BIG Things Video Series. According to Tom: "Women look at relationships with more depth and complexity than men do." It's essential to understand this if you're working with women in leadership positions or if you're developing products for women.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 2 minutes, 21 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Women & Relationships.
Happy Holidays!
Here's a video with a message for this season. It's video number 50 from The Little BIG Things Video Series. Kindness is free. Tom uses a surprising example from the healthcare industry to highlight the kind of impact kindness can have, without any financial investment.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 3 minutes, 24 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Kindness is Free.
It's time for two new sections in The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series. The next two sections in The Little BIG Things: 163 Ways to Pursue Excellence are titled "Customers" and "Action." In Customers, the message is the importance of communication - have you called a customer today? Action is, of course, all about doing. "She or he who tries the most stuff wins."
You can download free pdfs of those sections from The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series* by clicking below:
*The Synopsis Series is an adaptation that gives you a taste of the BIG idea in each of the 163 Little BIG Things. More information on the book can be found on this page. The Synopsis Series as released thus far can be found here.
Here's video number 48 from The Little BIG Things Video Series. Persistence. You've gotta have more than your share to succeed. There's plenty of advice out there about knowing when to give up. Tom's advice? Hold out longer than anyone thinks is wise.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 1 minute, 50 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Hold 'em and Fold 'em.
I could teach an entire MBA course using as source material the 20 September 2010 New Yorker profile of J.Crew CEO Mickey Drexler—titled "The Merchant: It's All About the Eye—And the Numbers."
In shorthand form, I have extracted a list of some of the items that are central to Drexler's approach. I present them here, and as a PowerPoint slide.
There is no doubt that these notions are especially fit for retailers. Yet I will unequivocally assert that this list with little modification applies to any flavor of business.
(For what it's worth, I'm also attaching this in PowerPoint.)
In video number 44 from The Little BIG Things Video Series, Tom does the math for you. It all comes down to lunch. Never Waste a Lunch!
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 2 minutes, 18 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: 12 x 20 = 240.
I have a new habit. Before flashing my title slide up on the screen these days, I offer up two others first—or "REALLY First Things Before First Things." I label them "X2." Or: "The Excellence TWO." They encompass two central ideas that often get lost in a list of 10 or 20 key ideas—or never make the list at all.
They encompass two notions of ... Surpassing Strategic Importance.
Two notions we all "care about"—but two notions that we frequently fail to ... OBSESS ... on. And it is precisely ... OBSESSION ... that is called for.
The X2:
EXCELLENCE in Cross-functional Communication and Integration.
EXCELLENCE in 1st-line management.
Check out the attached pdf.
Then act ... TODAY.
It's time for two new sections in The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series. The next two sections in The Little BIG Things: 163 Ways to Pursue Excellence are titled "Opportunity" and "Resilience." Both new sections focus on how to respond to difficult times.
You can download free pdfs of those sections from The Little BIG Things Synopsis Series* by clicking below:
#5 Opportunity
#6 Resilience
*The Synopsis Series is an adaptation that gives you a taste of the BIG idea in each of the 163 Little BIG Things. More information on the book can be found on this page. The Synopsis Series as released thus far can be found here.
In video number 40 from The Little BIG Things Video Series, Tom asks us to look for solutions that are astonishingly powerful, yet astonishingly unsexy.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 2 minutes, 54 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Sock Solution.
Following up on my seminar last week, aboard the "Seabourn Spirit" and aimed at independent retailers under attack from their "big box" brethren, I drafted "The Independent Retailer Edge." It is attached here as a pdf. I believe it holds to some extent beyond retail. Enjoy!
In video number 38 from The Little BIG Things Video Series, Tom describes just how powerful storytelling can be and argues that's why it's essential to turn your brand into a story.
You can find the video in the right column of the front page of tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 1 minutes, 55 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: The Story is More Powerful than the Brand.
Systems are necessary. But they shouldn't strangle you. Tom's all in favor of attacking your own systems, in order to serve the customer better. He gives a perfect example in a new video from The Little BIG Things Video Series.
You can find the video in the right column here at tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 1 minute, 29 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: War on Systems.
The day General McChrystal was canned, I was in Baltimore Washington International airport. Putting on my shoes after security, I found myself sitting next to a USMC major. I commented about McChrystal's calling former USMC Commandant Jim Jones a "clown." (I have very strong USMC ties, including an uncle who retired as a lieutenant general and served as a lieutenant colonel on Guadalcanal.) I expected the major to erupt. Instead he said, "Once they become generals, they all are mainly politicians." He said it in a matter-of-fact fashion, with no discernable rancor.
In fact he's right. McChrystal was a career special ops guy, and, as is characteristic of the genre, was known for being blunt and impolitic—it's a miracle he made it as far as he did. General Petraeus is, to the contrary, know as a superb politician. Many attach automatic opprobrium to the term "politician." They are sorely mistaken. General Powell was a masterful politician, as was General Eisenhower, whose political skills in holding the Allies together for the assault on the European mainland were far more important than his tactical skills. All the above pale by contrast to perhaps America's greatest political general—George Washington. In David McCullough's masterful 1776, we find Washington virtually every night alone in his tent writing numerous letters to members of the Continental Congress. Garnering their support for his faltering efforts was as important as fending off the British.
Implementation—at the level of "chief" of a 4-person project team in IS—is and always has been and always will be primarily about politics.
In fact it is axiomatic: Effective implementers are effective politicians, regardless of any synonym you may choose to substitute for politics.
purchasing 50mg viagra My dentist in Boston doesn't think much of my former dentist (and college roommate) in San Jose; and she makes no bones and minces no words about it. So, too, most specialists. And that includes generals. World War II was marked by a clear focus, unlike, say, Vietnam or Afghanistan. And yet the generals battled with and disparaged one another constantly. I am highly amused by the following quotes from one of my favorite books, David Irving's The War Between the Generals: Inside the Allied High Command:
"A man of great mediocrity."—General George Patton about General Omar Bradley (Bradley commanded U.S. ground forces on D-Day and beyond)
"A third-rate general. He never did anything or won any battle that any other general could not have won as well or better."—General Omar Bradley about Field Marshall Sir Bernard Montgomery
"If you want to end the war in any reasonable time, you will have to remove Ike's hand from the control of the land battle."—Sir Bernard Montgomery about General Dwight Eisenhower
"One thing that might help win this war is to get someone to shoot King."—General Dwight Eisenhower about Admiral Ernest King, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations
"Eisenhower, though supposed to be running the land war, is on the golf links at Rhiems—entirely detached and taking practically no part in running the war."—Sir Alan Brooke, Chief of Staff, British Army about General Dwight Eisenhower
"If the unhelpful British attitude continues, then I shall go home."—General Dwight Eisenhower
Thus is the nature of human affairs, in peace or war. As I hinted before, if you don't want to participate in the politics, then choose to follow a path that is not associated with leadership, or pretty much anything else—e.g., I've seen politicking for a Nobel prize up close, and it's not pretty.
(You may find exceptions to this rule, but if you do, be sure to specify the planet or galaxy from which they emanate.)
(FYI: You might look at Thomas Ricks' related "Lose a General, Win a War," in yesterday's New York Times.)
Who sits next to you? In this video called Strategy: Space Matters, Tom explains why who sits next to whom in your office can make a huge difference. The video is part of the The Little BIG Things Video Series.
You can find the video in the right column here at tompeters.com or you can watch the video on YouTube. [Time: 2 minutes, 41 seconds] You can also download a PDF transcript of the video's content: Strategy: Space Matters.
My economics prof introduced me to "Joe" years ago. He called it the "I know a man who" theory. I'll comment, "Statistically more lefthanders per capita get into injury-causing accidents." To which you respond, "Yeah, but my best friend, Alonzo, is a leftie without a mar on his record at age 32." In your mind, Alonzo overrides my analysis based on, say, a 3,000-accident sample.
I felt like Man-who Joe had me in an armlock the other day. I was tweeting about the economic value of kindness, thoughtfulness, etc. To which someone responded with a short list of names of wildly successful entrepreneurs and artists (symphony conductors) who are out-and-out jerks.
I know such folk, too. Many thereof. Yet my "defense"—which I fervently believe—was: "Yup, X & Y & Z are indeed v. successful jerks.
"But ...
"But you and I and the vast majority of us are simply not good enough to be able to overcome significant jerk-hood. That is, for those of us who are mortal (let's say 99% ++), thoughtfulness-kindness-attentiveness is a winning strategy, perhaps the only possible winning strategy."
I refuse to be trapped by "I know this guy Joe"!
3H
Howard-Hilton-Herb. Howard Schultz, Starbucks founder, visits 25 stores a week. Master hotelier Conrad Hilton says his only advice is "Don't forget to tuck the shower curtain into the bathtub." Southwest Airlines founder Herb Kelleher says his only advice is "You have to treat your employees as your primary customers."
My translation, more or less "all you need to know to succeed":
Stay in touch. [Howard]
Sweat the details. [Hilton]
Put your people first. [Herb.]
KRP
K = R = P
Kindness = Repeat business = Profit
LTYA
Listen.
Say "Thank you."
Apologize.
If you can become a full-fledged "professional" listener and master the arts of appreciation and apology [accountability], you will be 75 yards down the 100-yard path to success.
WDYT
What.
Do.
You.
Think.
"What do you think?" = Arguably the four most important words in business/leadership success.
RR
Resilience.
Relentlessness.
The successful person's "top 2" key traits.
RFA
Ready.
Fire.
Aim.
Vigorous action-relentless experimentation = [Only] effective foundation of progress, personal or organizational.
FFF
Fail.
Forward.
Fast.
(This is RFA's necessary handmaiden.)
ROIR
Return On Investment in Relationships.
Medium- to long-term: Relationships = Everything.
Hence: Purposeful investment in relationships is the most important "ROI."
C(I)>C(E)
Internal customers are more important than external customers when it comes to execution.
And, of course, always to be repeated in this space as my "signoff":
EXCELLENCE. Always.
If not EXCELLENCE, what?
If not EXCELLENCE now, when?

Sebastian Junger, best known for The Perfect Storm, now gives us War, based on harrowing months in which he was embedded in an American platoon in Afghanistan. Consider this, from the Economist review:
"Mr Junger ... is in awe of his fellows' fighting skills and acceptance of, sometimes, appalling danger. ... The main reason, Mr Junger observes and numerous studies have confirmed, is love. The Americans in the Korengal, heroes by the standards of any warrior culture, are not especially religious or patriotic. They show little interest in the war overall or allegiance to the army at large. ... Rather, with passionate intensity, they fight for each other. 'What the Army sociologists, with their clipboards and their questions and their meta-analyses slowly came to understand was that courage was love,' Mr Junger writes. 'In war, neither could exist without the other.'" viagra price australia
I believe these findings go back at least to sociological studies in the U.S. Army in World War II. That is, it is a commonplace. In the context of this Blog and its aims and prejudices, it is one more, perhaps the ultimate, confirmation of ... RELATIONSHIPS ARE EVERYTHING!

Epigraph from Matt Ridley's new and magisterial The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves:
"This division of labor, from which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom, which foresees and intends that general opulence to which it gives occasion. It is the necessary, though very slow and gradual, of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the prosperity to truck, barter, exchange one thing for another."—Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations
This is the essence of Smith's work, and the singular explanation of innovation. Innovation is driven by trading. Period. It is a singularly human trait, the origins of which are tens of thousands of years.
Of course our new tools, DARPANet, the Web, and more recently Social Media, are re-writing Smith's "slow and gradual."
It's not that you will necessarily learn anything "new" from this book, but you cannot help but learn a staggering amount about the innovation process among humans. To me, that learning is of the utmost practical value.
NB1: F.A. Hayek's felicitous phrase for "all this" is "spontaneous discovery process;" the key word is "spontaneous."
NB2: My longtime "bedrock"/"only certain belief" is: "He who tries the most stuff wins"/"Screw around vigorously"/"Ready. FIRE. Aim." I am now ready to revise it to: "He who makes the most oddball connections and tries the most stuff wins."
NB3: One of my five greatest literary indulgences ever is a 1st edition of The Wealth of Nations.
(Above: Susan and I move "up the hill" to our cottage/former "sap house" [where maple sap was boiled to produce syrup] for the summer, from about May 1 to October 10. Below: View of our "upper pond" from front door of said sap house—this morning at 6:30 a.m.)

When the yoghurt hits the fan, in corporations or the public sector, the response is invariably to centralize. Which, of course, makes things worse. I have watched this process proceed mercilessly for 40 years.
An Op-ed in yesterday's New York Times by Ross Douthat captured the phenomenon brilliantly, referencing in particular the financial crisis:
"Once a system grows sufficiently complex, it doesn't matter how badly our best and brightest foul things up. Every crisis increases their authority, because they seem to be the only ones who understand the system well enough to fix it. But their fixes tend to make the system even more complex and centralized, and more vulnerable to the next national-security surprise, the next natural disaster, the next economic crisis."
Amen.
Engineers love equations. I have an entire section in my new book which tries to reduce implementation to a set of equations. Two days ago I posted an equation that several in TwitterWorld seemed to have found useful:
K = R = P
(Kindness = Repeat Business = Profit.)
It is so clean that I should probably leave well enough alone.
But I can't.
So here's a set of three:
K = R = P
K + Q = R = P+
K + Q + W = R + N = P++
Kindness = Repeat Business = Profit.
Kindness + Quality = Repeat Business = Profit Plus.
Kindness + Quality + Wow! = Repeat Business + New Business = Profit Plus Plus.
And then, just to confuse things:
K(I) > K(O)
(Kindness to employees is more important than kindness to customers because kindness to employees is the best way to maximize long-term kindness to customers.)
I spent last summer inside, writing a book so that I could get notes like this:
"Thanks to your book, and the hit upside the head about the importance of flowers; we now have flowers every week in our offices AND I've arranged to have flowers delivered to my mom every two weeks—duh, why didn't I do that years ago. She's loving them!!
"Thank you for the continued inspiration."
That's from my colleague and friend Verne Harnish. Verne is CEO of Gazelles, and is the undisputed champion of growth companies.
And then there was the Tweet from a businessperson who had taken to heart my item on the power of a smile. He said he'd thought about it and was consciously applying "smile power" with remarkable results. I accused him of putting me on. He swears that he is not and that the change has been transformative.
Forget the "better human beings" bit. I'm not your pastor, so I'll settle for a more turned on-tuned in work force serving customers more effectively—courtesy smiles and flowers! (Well, I admit that I also do get off on the fact that Verne scored mega-points with his Mom!!)

I drafted this "Credo" months ago, and used a version of it in The Little BIG Things. I recently revisited it and added a few things. It is obviously too long to fit on a wallet-sized plastic card. On the other hand, it is a set of ideas ("Principles for doing business well and profitably"? "Elements of Excellence"?) worthy of attention and emulation. Use it as you will—and my apologies for the length. (We are also making it available as a PDF.) (My apologies for the length of the Post.)
Herewith, "Our Credo":
• We are thoughtful in all we do.
• We are excellent listeners—to each other and to all members of our extended family, including vendors, customers, communities, etc. We will make the development of listening skills a primary component in our training portfolio. (It is not coincidental that listening per se is so near the beginning of this document.)
• We will make the four words "What do you think?" an automatic instinct in all of our internal and external dealings; moreover, "What do you think?" will precede the explication of our own view in 99 out of 100 instances.
• We are dedicated to and measure our success to a significant degree by our unwavering commitment to the extreme personal growth of every one of our employees.
• We will only be "delighted" with our managers if their employees are universally surprised by the level of their personal and professional growth. We will measure this.
• We will be clear that we view leadership at every level as a sacred trust—and that leaders are indeed the servants of their employees just as the effective classroom teacher is servant to the lives and growth of her or his students.
• We believe that "people development" is everyone's responsibility. Hence, everyone will have a peer mentor from the start; and within a relatively short period after joining the organization will become themselves mentors; effectiveness as mentors will be a significant element in everyone's evaluation.
• We see senior officers as primarily in the "people development business." Hence we will place the particulars of development success as the #1 item in evaluating senior officers.
• We will not rest until we are widely acknowledged as an "employer of choice."
• We believe that it is possible to make the evaluation process a positive rather than a negative. We will provide training in evaluation, devote significant time to evaluation, and will place significant weight on effectiveness as an evaluator. We will measure this.
• We will be fanatic practitioners of MBWA, or managing by wandering around. Staying in touch is a top priority.
• We are smitten with the word "mastery." We expect everyone to pursue mastery of some skill from the outset, just as a military specialty is pursued from day #1.
• We believe it is our role to foster independence that will serve each employee well in her or his career wherever he or she may alight.
• We believe that everyone should become a leader; hence, leadership assignments of some sort will be undertaken within 90 days of coming aboard.
• We believe in the "inverted organization chart"—with the "leaders" at the "bottom" of a reverse pyramid.
• We believe that 1st-line supervisors, like corporals and sergeants in the military, are the lynchpins of morale and productivity and employee development and maintenance of the "corporate culture." Hence, we will seek to create a matchless 1st-line supervisorial cadre. We will, in effect, manage this cadre as a separate strategic priority.
• We will be a leader in research and development in every aspect of our business—and we will work primarily with vendors who are also fanatical about research and development; and work to attract a set of core customers willing to play at the edge of things and become our co-developers.
• We will aim to make our customer engagements adventures beyond the comfort zone, or adventures in growth to use a less intimidating phrase—we will aim to add value in novel ways that surprise and stretch our customers and ourselves.
• We expect to be renowned for our "insane" devotion to customer service. We shall measure this constantly.
• We will bring to bear overwhelming and instant and collective force to redress any customer problem, real or imagined.
• We will use the three words "Try it! Now!" almost as often as "What do you think?" We revere the experimental method, and believe success is mostly correlated with the number of things one tries.
• We wholeheartedly acknowledge the value of analysis, but in the end swear by "Actions speak louder than words."
• We "encourage" failures (actually "celebrate" failures); that is, we acknowledge that a near-religious devotion to "Try it! Now!" necessarily invites the failures that are part and parcel of trying new things.
• We will in fact look askance at those whose records include few or no failures—such a spotless record suggests an unwillingness to brave the unknown.
• We will, to summarize the last few items, all view ourselves as explorers-adventurers, proceeding toward individual and collective growth by actively engaging at the edge of things; we unstintingly believe that our customers will reap enormous value from our commitment to constant, restless exploration.
• We will cut "overhead" to zero—every "department" shall aim to be best-in-class in its arena, and hence a full-scale participant in our concerted effort to add value in all we do.
• We will exude integrity, individually and collectively.
• We will encourage and insist upon constant and vociferous disagreement, but be absolutely intolerant of disagreement in the form of personal attacks.
• We will exemplify the word transparency in all of our internal and external dealings—and bend over backwards to give new meaning and breadth to the term "information sharing."
• We will individually and collectively accept blame for our mistakes, or even our rather minor contribution to others' mistakes—and apologize accordingly and with dispatch.
• We will under no circumstance badmouth a competitor.
• We will aim to turn every customer contact into a memorable experience, remembering that all of life is indeed a stage.
• We honor the word "design" in all we do, in every nook and every cranny of our organization; every system, every web page, every customer invoice, every employee restroom is part of our purposefully designed "signature," and stands out and exudes exceptionalism in one way or another.
• We understand that difficult decisions must be made, but we will bend over backwards to implement such decisions with kindness and grace—the dignity of the individual will always be foremost in our mind.
• We will not intrude into our employees' lives, but we are committed to aggressively helping employees achieve a healthy lifestyle.
• We will master the art of appreciation and be profuse in our use of the words "Thank you" to honor assistance or achievement of even the most minor sort.
• We will acknowledge through celebration even small successes—and always cast a wide net in our "Thank yous" to include bit players, especially from other functions.
• We aim for others to always be surprised by our "vibrancy" and "vitality"—we view enthusiasm as the key to success in anything, and take particular care in leader selection to ensure that every one of our leaders is a "remarkable" "carrier" of enthusiasm through thick and, especially, thin.
• We will drop whatever we are doing and rush to the aid of those involved in tight-deadline activities—even if those involved caused some of their own problems.
• We will be careful in our planning, but also understand that nothing ever unfolds as planned—hence we will be known for our ability to muster resources in an instant, without fuss and from everywhere, to deal with the unexpected; participating in these ad hoc response activities will not be seen as a distraction from our "real work," but as a significant part of our "real work" and an opportunity to contribute to others and build our own skills in ways we might not have imagined.
• We live in an uncertain world. And resilience is a matchless survival trait. We will design every system and develop every person with a constant eye on overall and individual resilience.
• We fully acknowledge that other units-departments-functions have other points of view than ours, but we will bend over backwards to develop social connections with those in other functions so that dealings over warring perspectives are dealings among friends.
• We unequivocally believe that cross-functional communication is the #1 key to both execution and producing "value-added" for our Clients. We will therefore move heaven and earth to insure that barriers are removed and that cross-functional communication becomes a profound competitive advantage. Each unit in the organization shall visibly celebrate acts of noteworthy support from outside their department. We will insure that incentives, positive and, alas, negative, support this top priority.
• We acknowledge that agreed upon deadlines are holy writ, and will attempt to balance requisite urgency and requisite realism in all of our commitments.
• We will fight tooth and nail to minimize the complexity that "necessarily" comes with growth and the mere passage of time.
• We will declare total war on our own systems to insure that they do not strangle us.
• We gladly acknowledge that anyone in the organization has the duty as well as the right to challenge anyone else when he or she believes they have a valid and useful perspective to offer—this is particularly true regarding any issue that has to do with safety, quality or meeting agreed upon deadlines; such challenges may be firm but not rude.
• We will be civil in all our dealings with one another.
• We will bend over backwards to bring truly (not superficially) diverse views of every stripe imaginable to bear on plans and decisions of every sort.
• We will pursue "diversity" in part so that the composition of our workforce and leadership from top to bottom is a "pretty good" reflection of the demographics of the markets we serve or aim to serve.
• We will use new technology tools to extend the definition of "our family" to every corner of the globe—we will welcome ideas and participation in our affairs from anyone and everyone.
• We will aim for gender balance in all we do and from tippy top to bottom—for reasons commercial more than reasons moral.
• We will be responsive in every way to the overwhelmingly large women's market—ignored by so many.
• We will be responsive in every way to the overwhelmingly large boomer/boomer+ market—ignored by so many.
• We will never, in any way, compromise on the quality of our products or services—regardless of difficulties in our marketplace and economy.
• We wholeheartedly acknowledge that in the short term (as well, obviously, as the long term) we must be profitable and exhibit stellar financial performance that is consistent with the audacious efforts to serve our people and our clients as described above.
• We aim to be seen by others as "conservative" in our financial practices.
• We shall talk about EXCELLENCE constantly.
• We shall unfailingly aim for EXCELLENCE in all we do.
• We shall use EXCELLENCE as the principal benchmark in the assessment of ourselves and our work and our impact on our Clients.
• We shall never forget that the bedrock of EXCELLENCE is the unwavering commitment to growth of 100% of our employees—and in fact all of those with whom we come in contact.*
*Perhaps some subset of these items will become a true "Credo." If so, I would suggest that something like the full list be enumerated as organizational "objectives."
What we're talking about on the front page.
brand viagra on sale in canada - December 2007
Before blogging became all the rage, Tom was posting book reviews and Observations (essentially early blog posts) to this site. You can find the archives below.
viagra for sales in india - October 1999
What we're talking about
on the front page.